On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 03:44:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Run the cgroup writeback test on xfs, for which I've just posted > a patch to support cgroup writeback as well as ext2 and f2fs, which > have supported cgroup writeback for a while now. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > --- > tests/shared/011 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/shared/011 b/tests/shared/011 > index a0ac375d..96ce9d1c 100755 > --- a/tests/shared/011 > +++ b/tests/shared/011 > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ rm -f $seqres.full > # real QA test starts here > > # Modify as appropriate. > -_supported_fs ext4 btrfs > +_supported_fs ext2 ext4 f2fs btrfs xfs Per my comments in another e-mail thread, given how many of the primary file systems support cgroup-aware writeback, maybe we should just remove the _supported_fs line and move this test to generic? Whether we like it or not, there are more and more userspace tools which assume that cgroup-aware writeback is a thing. Alternatively, maybe we should have some standardized way so the kernel can signal whether or not a particular mounted file system supports cgroup-aware writeback? - Ted
