Re: [PATCH] xfs: test xfs_info on block device and mountpoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 09:49:48AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:49:54PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > There was a bug, xfs_info fails on a mounted block device:
> > 
> >   # xfs_info /dev/mapper/testdev
> >   xfs_info: /dev/mapper/testdev contains a mounted filesystem
> > 
> >   fatal error -- couldn't initialize XFS library
> > 
> > xfsprogs has fixed it, this case is used to cover this bug.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/1000     | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/xfs/1000.out |  2 ++
> >  tests/xfs/group    |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/1000
> >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/1000.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/1000 b/tests/xfs/1000
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..689fe9e7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/1000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test No. 1000
> > +#
> > +# test xfs_info on block device and mountpoint
> > +#
> > +seq=`basename $0`
> > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> > +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> > +
> > +here=`pwd`
> > +tmp=/tmp/$$
> > +status=1	# failure is the default!
> > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > +	cd /
> > +	rm -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> > +. ./common/rc
> > +
> > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +_supported_os Linux
> > +_require_scratch
> > +
> > +test_xfs_info()
> > +{
> > +	local target="$1"
> > +	local file=$tmp.$seq.info
> > +
> > +	$XFS_INFO_PROG $target > $file 2>&1
> > +	if [ $? -ne 0 ];then
> > +		echo "$XFS_INFO_PROG $target fails:"
> > +		cat $file
> 
> Should we compare the contents between the two xfs_info invocations?

Hmm, make sense!

> 
> > +	else
> > +		cat $file >> $seqres.full
> > +	fi
> > +}
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> > +# test unmounted block device(contains XFS)
> > +# Due to old xfsprogs doesn't support xfs_info a unmounted device, skip it
> > +$XFS_DB_PROG -c "info" $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "command info not found"
> 
> Does _require_xfs_db_command not work here?

Wow, I forgot it, thanks for reminding:)

> 
> --D
> 
> > +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> > +	test_xfs_info $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +fi
> > +
> > +_scratch_mount
> > +# test mounted block device and mountpoint
> > +test_xfs_info $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +test_xfs_info $SCRATCH_MNT
> > +
> > +echo "Silence is golden"
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/1000.out b/tests/xfs/1000.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..681b3b48
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/1000.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 1000
> > +Silence is golden
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group
> > index ffe4ae12..047fe332 100644
> > --- a/tests/xfs/group
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/group
> > @@ -504,3 +504,4 @@
> >  504 auto quick mkfs label
> >  505 auto quick spaceman
> >  506 auto quick health
> > +1000 auto quick
> > -- 
> > 2.17.2
> > 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux