On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:55:54AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> There are several functions which have no opportunity to retun
> an error, and don't contain any ASSERTs which could be argued
> to be better constructed as error cases. So, make them voids
> to simplify the callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
....
> @@ -1840,7 +1840,6 @@ xlog_sync(
> uint count_init; /* initial count before roundup */
> int roundoff; /* roundoff to BB or stripe */
> int split = 0; /* split write into two regions */
> - int error;
> int v2 = xfs_sb_version_haslogv2(&log->l_mp->m_sb);
> int size;
>
> @@ -1959,11 +1958,8 @@ xlog_sync(
> * Don't call xfs_bwrite here. We do log-syncs even when the filesystem
> * is shutting down.
> */
> - error = xlog_bdstrat(bp);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, "xlog_sync");
> - return error;
> - }
> + xlog_bdstrat(bp);
Shouldn't this be checking bp->b_error rather than completely
ignoring buffer submit errors?
> +
> if (split) {
> bp = iclog->ic_log->l_xbuf;
> XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, 0); /* logical 0 */
> @@ -1978,11 +1974,7 @@ xlog_sync(
>
> /* account for internal log which doesn't start at block #0 */
> XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) + log->l_logBBstart);
> - error = xlog_bdstrat(bp);
> - if (error) {
> - xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, "xlog_sync (split)");
> - return error;
> - }
> + xlog_bdstrat(bp);
Ditto.
Otherwise it looks fine.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
