On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:30:52AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 06:40:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Teach online scrub and repair how to check and reset the superblock
> > inode and block counters. The AG rebuilding functions will need these
> > to adjust the counts if they need to change as a part of recovering from
> > corruption. We must use the repair freeze mechanism to prevent any
> > other changes while we do this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> .....
> > +/*
> > + * FS Summary Counters
> > + * ===================
> > + *
> > + * The basics of filesystem summary counter checking are that we iterate the
> > + * AGs counting the number of free blocks, free space btree blocks, per-AG
> > + * reservations, inodes, delayed allocation reservations, and free inodes.
> > + * Then we compare what we computed against the in-core counters.
> > + *
> > + * However, the reality is that summary counters are a tricky beast to check.
> > + * While we /could/ freeze the filesystem and scramble around the AGs counting
> > + * the free blocks, in practice we prefer not do that for a scan because
> > + * freezing is costly. To get around this, we added a per-cpu counter of the
> > + * delalloc reservations so that we can rotor around the AGs relatively
> > + * quickly, and we allow the counts to be slightly off because we're not
> > + * taking any locks while we do this.
> > + */
> > +
> > +int
> > +xchk_setup_fscounters(
> > + struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > +{
> > + sc->buf = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(struct xchk_fscounters), KM_SLEEP);
> > + if (!sc->buf)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Pause background reclaim while we're scrubbing to reduce the
> > + * likelihood of background perturbations to the counters throwing
> > + * off our calculations.
> > + */
> > + xchk_disable_reclaim(sc);
>
> Naming :)
Fixed.
> > +
> > + return xchk_trans_alloc(sc, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Calculate what the global in-core counters ought to be from the AG header
> > + * contents. Callers can compare this to the actual in-core counters to
> > + * calculate by how much both in-core and on-disk counters need to be
> > + * adjusted.
> > + */
> > +STATIC int
> > +xchk_fscounters_calc(
> > + struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> > + struct xchk_fscounters *fsc)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = sc->mp;
> > + struct xfs_buf *agi_bp;
> > + struct xfs_buf *agf_bp;
> > + struct xfs_agi *agi;
> > + struct xfs_agf *agf;
> > + struct xfs_perag *pag;
> > + uint64_t delayed;
> > + xfs_agnumber_t agno;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + for (agno = 0; agno < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; agno++) {
> > + /* Lock both AG headers. */
> > + error = xfs_ialloc_read_agi(mp, sc->tp, agno, &agi_bp);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > + error = xfs_alloc_read_agf(mp, sc->tp, agno, 0, &agf_bp);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > + if (!agf_bp)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* Count all the inodes */
> > + agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(agi_bp);
> > + fsc->icount += be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_count);
> > + fsc->ifree += be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_freecount);
> > +
> > + /* Add up the free/freelist/bnobt/cntbt blocks */
> > + agf = XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(agf_bp);
> > + fsc->fdblocks += be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks);
> > + fsc->fdblocks += be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount);
> > + fsc->fdblocks += be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_btreeblks);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Per-AG reservations are taken out of the incore counters,
> > + * so they must be left out of the free blocks computation.
> > + */
> > + pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, agno);
> > + fsc->fdblocks -= pag->pag_meta_resv.ar_reserved;
> > + fsc->fdblocks -= pag->pag_rmapbt_resv.ar_orig_reserved;
> > + xfs_perag_put(pag);
> > +
> > + xfs_trans_brelse(sc->tp, agf_bp);
> > + xfs_trans_brelse(sc->tp, agi_bp);
> > + }
>
> Hmmmm. Do we have all these counters in the perag?
Yes.
> If we do, we've already checked them against the on-disk structures,
> yes?
Not necessarily, if someone calls the fscounter scrubber without calling
the ag header scrubbers then they could be wrong. Granted, the incore
counters are supposed to match ondisk counters and unless there's a
software bug or bad memory then they're going to match. Ok, I think I'm
convinced that we can use the incore counters here, along with a warmup
function in the setup function to make sure pagf_init and pagi_init == 1
and spot check the correspondence.
Oh, hey, the ag header scrubbers don't check the incore counters either.
I'll add that too.
> So can we just do a pass across the perags to sum the space usage?
That sounds like a nice way to speed this up further.
> And if we don't ahve them all in the perag, should we add them?
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The global incore space reservation is taken from the incore
> > + * counters, so leave that out of the computation.
> > + */
> > + fsc->fdblocks -= mp->m_resblks_avail;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Delayed allocation reservations are taken out of the incore counters
> > + * but not recorded on disk, so leave them and their indlen blocks out
> > + * of the computation.
> > + */
> > + delayed = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_delalloc_blks);
> > + fsc->fdblocks -= delayed;
> > +
> > + trace_xchk_fscounters_calc(mp, fsc->icount, fsc->ifree, fsc->fdblocks,
> > + delayed);
> > +
> > + /* Bail out if the values we compute are totally nonsense. */
> > + if (!xfs_verify_icount(mp, fsc->icount) ||
> > + fsc->fdblocks > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks ||
> > + fsc->ifree > fsc->icount)
> > + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>
> I suspect we need some tolerance here on ifree vs icount as icount
> can decrease as we free inode chunks....
TBH I was half convinced that the ifree check here only needed to make
sure that the value isn't larger than the number of possible inodes in
the filesystem, since we do all the thresholding stuff later anyway.
> > +/*
> > + * Is the @counter within an acceptable range of @expected?
> > + *
> > + * Currently that means 1/16th (6%) or @nr_range of the @expected value.
> > + */
>
> 6% is a lot for large filesystems, especially for block counts. That
> can be entire AGs missing. I suspect the tolerance should be
> related to AG count in some way....
Yeah, I'm going to ponder this while I make dinner...
> > +static inline bool
> > +xchk_fscounter_within_range(
> > + struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> > + struct percpu_counter *counter,
> > + uint64_t expected,
> > + uint64_t nr_range)
> > +{
> > + int64_t value = percpu_counter_sum(counter);
> > + uint64_t range;
> > +
> > + range = max_t(uint64_t, expected >> 4, nr_range);
> > + if (value < 0)
> > + return false;
> > + if (range < expected && value < expected - range)
> > + return false;
> > + if ((int64_t)(expected + range) >= 0 && value > expected + range)
> > + return false;
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Check the superblock counters. */
> > +int
> > +xchk_fscounters(
> > + struct xfs_scrub *sc)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = sc->mp;
> > + struct xchk_fscounters *fsc = sc->buf;
> > + int64_t icount, ifree, fdblocks;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + icount = percpu_counter_sum(&sc->mp->m_icount);
> > + ifree = percpu_counter_sum(&sc->mp->m_ifree);
> > + fdblocks = percpu_counter_sum(&sc->mp->m_fdblocks);
>
> We have a local mp var in this function :)
Ok.
> > +
> > + if (icount < 0 || ifree < 0 || fdblocks < 0)
> > + xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, mp->m_sb_bp);
> > +
> > + /* See if icount is obviously wrong. */
> > + if (!xfs_verify_icount(mp, icount))
> > + xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, mp->m_sb_bp);
> > +
> > + /* See if fdblocks / ifree are obviously wrong. */
> > + if (fdblocks > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
> > + xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, mp->m_sb_bp);
> > + if (ifree > icount)
> > + xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, mp->m_sb_bp);
> > +
> > + /* If we already know it's bad, we can skip the AG iteration. */
> > + if (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Counters seem ok, but let's count them. */
> > + error = xchk_fscounters_calc(sc, fsc);
> > + if (!xchk_process_error(sc, 0, XFS_SB_BLOCK(sc->mp), &error))
> > + return error;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Compare the in-core counters with whatever we counted. We'll
> > + * consider the inode counts ok if they're within 1024 inodes, and the
> > + * free block counts if they're within 1/64th of the filesystem size.
> > + */
> > + if (!xchk_fscounter_within_range(sc, &mp->m_icount, fsc->icount, 1024))
> > + xchk_block_set_corrupt(sc, mp->m_sb_bp);
>
> We've already summed the percpu counters at this point - why do we
> pass them into xchk_fscounter_within_range() and them sum them
> again?
Hmm. Yeah, we don't need to do that again.
> Also, what's the magic 1024 here?
100% Magic. :)
--D
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
