[PATCH] xfs: fix btree scrub checking with regards to root-in-inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

In xchk_btree_check_owner, we can be passed a null buffer pointer.  This
should only happen for the root of a root-in-inode btree type, but we
should program defensively in case the btree cursor state ever gets
screwed up and we get a null buffer anyway.

Coverity-id: 1438713
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c
index 6271a277eabe..cf4046c9e250 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c
@@ -481,8 +481,17 @@ xchk_btree_check_owner(
 	struct xfs_btree_cur	*cur = bs->cur;
 	struct check_owner	*co;
 
-	if ((cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE) && bp == NULL)
+	/*
+	 * In theory, xfs_btree_get_block should only give us a null buffer
+	 * pointer for the root of a root-in-inode btree type, but we need
+	 * to check defensively here in case the cursor state is also screwed
+	 * up.
+	 */
+	if (bp == NULL) {
+		if (!(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE))
+			xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, level);
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We want to cross-reference each btree block with the bnobt



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux