Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't trip over uninitialized buffer on extent read of corrupted inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:39:03AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> We've had rather rare reports of bmap btree block corruption where
> the bmap root block has a level count of zero. The root cause of the
> corruption is so far unknown. We do have verifier checks to detect
> this form of on-disk corruption, but this doesn't cover a memory
> corruption variant of the problem. The latter is a reasonable
> possibility because the root block is part of the inode fork and can
> reside in-core for some time before inode extents are read.
> 
> If this occurs, it leads to a system crash such as the following:
> 
>  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffff00000221
>  PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
>  ...
>  RIP: 0010:xfs_trans_brelse+0xf/0x200 [xfs]
>  ...
>  Call Trace:
>   xfs_iread_extents+0x379/0x540 [xfs]
>   xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay+0x11a/0xb40 [xfs]
>   ? xfs_attr_get+0xd1/0x120 [xfs]
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   xfs_file_iomap_begin+0x4c4/0x6d0 [xfs]
>   ? __vfs_getxattr+0x53/0x70
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   iomap_apply+0x63/0x130
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   iomap_file_buffered_write+0x62/0x90
>   ? iomap_write_begin.constprop.40+0x2d0/0x2d0
>   xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0xe4/0x3b0 [xfs]
>   __vfs_write+0x150/0x1b0
>   vfs_write+0xba/0x1c0
>   ksys_pwrite64+0x64/0xa0
>   do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x1d0
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> The crash occurs because xfs_iread_extents() attempts to release an
> uninitialized buffer pointer as the level == 0 value prevented the
> buffer from ever being allocated or read. Change the level > 0
> assert to an explicit error check in xfs_iread_extents() to avoid
> crashing the kernel in the event of localized, in-core inode
> corruption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>From a static analysis standpoint this looks fine, but it feels a little
weird not to know what the root cause is.  I scanned around briefly but
nothing obvious stood out.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 48502cb9990f..ae4c3b0d84db 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -1191,7 +1191,10 @@ xfs_iread_extents(
>  	 * Root level must use BMAP_BROOT_PTR_ADDR macro to get ptr out.
>  	 */
>  	level = be16_to_cpu(block->bb_level);
> -	ASSERT(level > 0);
> +	if (unlikely(level == 0)) {
> +		XFS_ERROR_REPORT(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp);
> +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +	}
>  	pp = XFS_BMAP_BROOT_PTR_ADDR(mp, block, 1, ifp->if_broot_bytes);
>  	bno = be64_to_cpu(*pp);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux