On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:13 AM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove typedefs and consolidate local variable initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> index de46f26c5292..16731d2d684b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
> @@ -426,26 +426,22 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_to_node(
> static int /* error */
> xfs_dir2_leafn_add(
> struct xfs_buf *bp, /* leaf buffer */
> - xfs_da_args_t *args, /* operation arguments */
> + struct xfs_da_args *args, /* operation arguments */
> int index) /* insertion pt for new entry */
> {
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> + struct xfs_inode *dp = args->dp;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf = bp->b_addr;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *lep;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> int compact; /* compacting stale leaves */
> - xfs_inode_t *dp; /* incore directory inode */
> - int highstale; /* next stale entry */
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf; /* leaf structure */
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_entry_t *lep; /* leaf entry */
> + int highstale = 0; /* next stale entry */
> int lfloghigh; /* high leaf entry logging */
> int lfloglow; /* low leaf entry logging */
> - int lowstale; /* previous stale entry */
> - struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> - struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> + int lowstale = 0; /* previous stale entry */
>
> trace_xfs_dir2_leafn_add(args, index);
>
> - dp = args->dp;
> - leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - highstale = 0;
> - lowstale = 0;
> dp->d_ops->leaf_hdr_from_disk(&leafhdr, leaf);
> ents = dp->d_ops->leaf_ents_p(leaf);
What about moving the initialization of `ents` above? (Or would that
be over the line limit?)
In general, I like this change (I considered asking Nathan to do the
consolidation of declaration and initialization as you've done). The
additional part of converting from _t to struct * is less interesting
(but still ok). It's better to be consistent within the function
scope, but this translation unit is still a mismatch of styles. If
the goal is to avoid typedefs, consider removing them from existence
and the required work to consistently not use them throughout this
code.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
