On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:24:51PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > I'm a little confused where we're at with this one given the discussion > on the previous version. We've dropped the locking, but left the > tracking in place. Are we just relying on holding the agi in the > iunlink/iunlink_remove cases? If so, that seems reasonable to me but the > commit log should probably have a sentence or two on the serialization > rules. The commit log could also use an update to describe how this > value is actually used in this patch (as an unmount time check) as > opposed to some apparent throttling functionality that isn't a part of > this series. I thought we Darrick was going to drop this tracking from the series, as it isn't very useful (at least yet), but maybe I misunderstood the previous thread.
