[Bug 202441] Possibly vfs cache related replicable xfs regression since 4.19.0 on sata hdd:s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202441

--- Comment #15 from Dave Chinner (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) ---
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:19:52PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202441
> 
> --- Comment #13 from Roger (rogan6710@xxxxxxxxx) ---
> Considering that rc8 which I believe was released as 4.19.0 did not show any
> problems on my 24G machine I must have managed to get a false positive on
> 4.19.0. The machine I tested that on has less ram (8G) but I don't know if
> that
> matters.
> 
> Anyhow, after a filthy amount of copying and compiling I can say that
> something probably went wrong between 4.19.2, which is ok, and 4.19.3
> which is not, at least on this 9590. 

Thank you!

We crossed streams - I was writing the email suggesting this when,
in fact, your were way ahead of me.

> I downloaded, compiled, and tested all rc versions, 4.19.{2,3,5,9} and
> verified
> that 4.19.{3,5,9,18} all have the problems described above on the 9590.
> All tests were done in console (nomodeset) directly after boot.

Ok, I'll have a look at the 4.19.2 -> 4.19.3 history now and see
what pops out.

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux