On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:19:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Move the kernel-specific parts of xfs_ialloc into a separate function in
> preparation for hoisting xfs_ialloc to libxfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 403eb8fa2f1f..b635d43caeed 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,32 @@ xfs_lookup(
> return error;
> }
>
> +/* Return an exclusive ILOCK'd in-core inode. */
> +static int
> +xfs_ialloc_iget(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> + xfs_ino_t ino,
> + struct xfs_inode **ipp)
> +{
> + return xfs_iget(mp, tp, ino, XFS_IGET_CREATE, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, ipp);
> +}
This is just too ugly and pointless. Can you explain (or even better
show code) why we really need this for xfsprogs?
> + xfs_ialloc_platform_init(tp, args, ip);
And that platform naming also is rather horrible.
