Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: check the ir_startino alignment directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:37:44AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:32:26AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:32:47PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > In xchk_iallocbt_rec, check the alignment of ir_startino by converting
> > > the inode cluster block alignment into units of inodes instead of the
> > > other way around (converting ir_startino to blocks).  This prevents us
> > > from tripping over off-by-one errors in ir_startino which are obscured
> > > by the inode -> block conversion.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> > > index fd431682db0b..1c6fef9b3799 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> > > @@ -265,6 +265,53 @@ xchk_iallocbt_check_freemask(
> > >  	return error;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +/*
> > > + * Make sure this inode btree record is aligned properly.  Because a fs block
> > > + * contains multiple inodes, we check that the inobt record is aligned to the
> > > + * correct inode, not just the correct block on disk.  This results in a finer
> > > + * grained corruption check.
> > > + */
> > > +STATIC void
> > > +xchk_iallocbt_rec_alignment(
> > > +	struct xchk_btree		*bs,
> > > +	struct xfs_inobt_rec_incore	*irec)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct xfs_mount		*mp = bs->sc->mp;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * finobt records have different positioning requirements than inobt
> > > +	 * records: each finobt record must have a corresponding inobt record.
> > > +	 * That is checked in the xref function, so for now we only catch the
> > > +	 * obvious case where the record isn't at all aligned properly.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * Note that if a fs block contains more than a single chunk of inodes,
> > > +	 * we will have finobt records only for those chunks containing free
> > > +	 * inodes, and therefore expect chunk alignment of finobt records.
> > > +	 * Otherwise, we expect that the finobt record is aligned to the
> > > +	 * cluster alignment as told by the superblock.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (bs->cur->bc_btnum == XFS_BTNUM_FINO) {
> > > +		unsigned int	imask;
> > > +
> > > +		imask = min_t(unsigned int, XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK,
> > > +				mp->m_cluster_align_inodes) - 1;
> > > +		if (irec->ir_startino & imask)
> > > +			xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > 
> > Don't we also need this large FSB alignment fixup for inobt records, or
> > am I still confused? :/ I.e., if ->m_cluster_align_inodes is 128 and
> > irec is the second inobt record in a block..
> 
> The logic added in the next patch checks that either an inobt record is
> aligned to m_cluster_align_inodes, or that the record covers inodes that
> are immediately after the previous inobt record.  In theory that should
> fix our handling of the large FSB case, though I've only tested it on
> qemu arm boxen.
> 

Ah right, that comes later. Thanks...

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

> --D
> 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > +	/* inobt records must be aligned to cluster and inoalignmnt size. */
> > > +	if (irec->ir_startino & (mp->m_cluster_align_inodes - 1)) {
> > > +		xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (irec->ir_startino & (mp->m_inodes_per_cluster - 1)) {
> > > +		xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /* Scrub an inobt/finobt record. */
> > >  STATIC int
> > >  xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> > > @@ -277,7 +324,6 @@ xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> > >  	uint64_t			holes;
> > >  	xfs_agnumber_t			agno = bs->cur->bc_private.a.agno;
> > >  	xfs_agino_t			agino;
> > > -	xfs_agblock_t			agbno;
> > >  	xfs_extlen_t			len;
> > >  	int				holecount;
> > >  	int				i;
> > > @@ -304,11 +350,9 @@ xchk_iallocbt_rec(
> > >  		goto out;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	/* Make sure this record is aligned to cluster and inoalignmnt size. */
> > > -	agbno = XFS_AGINO_TO_AGBNO(mp, irec.ir_startino);
> > > -	if ((agbno & (mp->m_cluster_align - 1)) ||
> > > -	    (agbno & (mp->m_blocks_per_cluster - 1)))
> > > -		xchk_btree_set_corrupt(bs->sc, bs->cur, 0);
> > > +	xchk_iallocbt_rec_alignment(bs, &irec);
> > > +	if (bs->sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT)
> > > +		goto out;
> > >  
> > >  	iabt->inodes += irec.ir_count;
> > >  
> > > 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux