Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: never try to scrub more than 64 inodes per inobt record

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 06:08:33PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Make sure we never check more than XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK inodes for any
> given inobt record since there can be more than one inobt record mapped
> to an inode cluster.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> index 882dc56c5c21..fd431682db0b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/ialloc.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ xchk_iallocbt_check_freemask(
>  	int				error = 0;
>  
>  	/* Make sure the freemask matches the inode records. */
> -	nr_inodes = mp->m_inodes_per_cluster;
> +	nr_inodes = min_t(unsigned int, XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK,
> +			mp->m_inodes_per_cluster);
>  

I'm wondering why we wouldn't also use nr_inodes in the loop immediately
below instead of ->m_inodes_per_cluster, but it looks like this all
changes in the following patches.

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  	for (agino = irec->ir_startino;
>  	     agino < irec->ir_startino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK;
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux