Re: XFS metadata corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Had to cancel it at 24G at size after I read that it can be 10% of actual partition size :)

> On Dec 18, 2018, at 9:43 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 12/18/18 2:42 PM, Predrag Mijatovic wrote:
>> I realize it will be less than 12T (btw it’s almost full) but it will still take a lot (more than few GBs), no?
> 
> yes, possibly.  If it's unwieldy we can try to do some remote
> debugging with xfs_db, but having a metadata image can be very helpful
> at times.  No promises though.  ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> -Eric
> 
>> Also, I read on RedHat website that it should be unmounted...
>> 
>>> On Dec 18, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 12/18/18 2:26 PM, Predrag Mijatovic wrote:
>>>> It’s a 12T partition so it will take a while (plus I can’t start it before tomorrow morning)
>>> 
>>> Just FYI, a metadump is metadata-only so the time and space it takes will
>>> be a) much less than a full 12T and b) proportional to the amount of
>>> metadata you have in the filesystem.
>>> 
>>> Note, the fs does need to be offline to get a metadump.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Eric
>>> 
>>> 
>> 





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux