RFD: question/probe regarding adding dump-levels A-Z after 0-9 for xfs{dump,restore}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RFD: question/probe regarding adding dump-levels A-Z after 0-9 for xfs{dump,restore}
From: L A Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 05:09:17 -0800
User-agent: Thunderbird

How difficult would it be to allow 26 more dump levels
in xfs dump/restore?  Theoretically anyone using 0-9
would see no change.  Would there be some "problem" or
"gotcha" in adding in what would _seem_ to be a simple
change?

thanks,
-linda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFD: question/probe regarding adding dump-levels A-Z after 0-9 for xfs{dump,restore}
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC] Ext4: fix deadlock on dirty pages between fault and writeback
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/10] xfs: change xfs_attr3_rmt_hdr_ok to return bool
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 00/12] xfstests: add copy/dedupe/clone to fsx/fsstress
Next by thread: Re: RFD: question/probe regarding adding dump-levels A-Z after 0-9 for xfs{dump,restore}
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux