https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201897 --- Comment #5 from Zorro Lang (zlang@xxxxxxxxxx) --- (In reply to Zorro Lang from comment #4) > V5 XFS without reflink feature test pass: > # ./check generic/482 > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 ibm-x3650m4-10 4.20.0-rc1 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m reflink=0,rmapbt=0,finobt=0,crc=1 -i sparse=0 > /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 > /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch /mnt/scratch > > generic/482 1567s ... 774s > Ran: generic/482 > Passed all 1 tests > > # ./check generic/482 > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 ibm-x3650m4-10 4.20.0-rc1 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m reflink=0,rmapbt=0,finobt=1,crc=1 -i sparse=1 > /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 > /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch /mnt/scratch > > > generic/482 774s ... 841s > Ran: generic/482 > Passed all 1 tests Hmm... maybe I said that too early :/ (below 4.20-rc1 contains xfs-4.20-fixes-3) ... FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 ibm-x3650m4-10 4.20.0-rc1 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m reflink=0,rmapbt=0,finobt=1,crc=1 -i sparse=1 /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch /mnt/scratch generic/482 841s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /root/git/xfstests-dev/results//generic/482.out.bad) --- tests/generic/482.out 2018-11-25 23:54:50.488528619 -0500 +++ /root/git/xfstests-dev/results//generic/482.out.bad 2018-12-05 05:07:01.060133234 -0500 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 482 -Silence is golden +_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch is inconsistent (r) +(see /root/git/xfstests-dev/results//generic/482.full for details) ... (Run 'diff -u /root/git/xfstests-dev/tests/generic/482.out /root/git/xfstests-dev/results//generic/482.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/482 Failures: generic/482 Failed 1 of 1 tests # cat results/generic/482.full # ./ltp/fsstress -w -d /mnt/scratch -n 512 -p 8 seed = 1543732939 mark mkfs has entry number 235 next fua is entry number 239 === replay to 239 === next fua is entry number 244 === replay to 244 === next fua is entry number 247 === replay to 247 === next fua is entry number 259 === replay to 259 === next fua is entry number 283 === replay to 283 === next fua is entry number 284 === replay to 284 === next fua is entry number 289 === replay to 289 === next fua is entry number 309 === replay to 309 === next fua is entry number 319 === replay to 319 === _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/rhel_ibm--x3650m4--10-xfscratch is inconsistent (r) *** xfs_repair -n output *** Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... Phase 2 - using internal log - zero log... - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... - found root inode chunk Phase 3 - for each AG... - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists... - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... - agno = 0 - agno = 1 - agno = 2 bad symlink header ino 134304910, file block 0, disk block 16788111 problem with symbolic link in inode 134304910 would have cleared inode 134304910 - agno = 3 - process newly discovered inodes... Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... - setting up duplicate extent list... - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... - agno = 0 - agno = 2 - agno = 1 entry "l6" in shortform directory 134304896 references free inode 134304910 - agno = 3 would have junked entry "l6" in directory inode 134304896 bad symlink header ino 134304910, file block 0, disk block 16788111 problem with symbolic link in inode 134304910 would have cleared inode 134304910 No modify flag set, skipping phase 5 Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... - traversing filesystem ... entry "l6" in shortform directory inode 134304896 points to free inode 134304910 would junk entry - traversal finished ... - moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ... Phase 7 - verify link counts... Maximum metadata LSN (1:962) is ahead of log (1:141). Would format log to cycle 4. No modify flag set, skipping filesystem flush and exiting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.