On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:47:13PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:03:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:19:08AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It returns EINVAL when the operation is not supported by the > > > filesystem. Fix it to return EOPNOTSUPP to be consistent with > > > the man page and clone_file_range(). > > > > > > Clean up the inconsistent error return handling while I'm there. > > > (I know, lipstick on a pig, but every little bit helps...) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks ok, would rather just shred this ioctl and make a better one. :P > > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --D > > > > > --- > > > fs/read_write.c | 15 +++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > > > index bfcb4ced5664..aa43224bcec6 100644 > > > --- a/fs/read_write.c > > > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > > > @@ -2094,17 +2094,18 @@ int vfs_dedupe_file_range(struct file *file, struct file_dedupe_range *same) > > > off = same->src_offset; > > > len = same->src_length; > > > > > > - ret = -EISDIR; > > > + if (!file->f_op->remap_file_range) > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > Minor downside: this causes regressions in generic/158 because > directories and device files don't have a ->remap_file_range > implementation. I think it can be solved by moving this check after the > !S_ISREG check below. Done. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx