Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs_scrub: fix fractional reporting of single inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/9/18 5:45 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

When there are fewer than 1024 inodes in the filesystem, scrub reports
fractional inodes in its final report:

35.2MiB data used;  5.0 inodes used.
34.2MiB data found; 5.0 inodes found.
5.0 inodes counted; 5.0 inodes checked.

Inodes are indivisible, so only report the fractional part when we have
a large enough number of inodes to perform a unit conversion:

35.2MiB data used;  5 inodes used.
34.2MiB data found; 5 inodes found.
5 inodes counted; 5 inodes checked.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  scrub/common.c |    5 ++++-
  scrub/common.h |    2 +-
  scrub/phase7.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)


diff --git a/scrub/common.c b/scrub/common.c
index 96b86a26..78afc4bf 100644
--- a/scrub/common.c
+++ b/scrub/common.c
@@ -200,10 +200,12 @@ auto_space_units(
  double
  auto_units(
  	unsigned long long	number,
-	char			**units)
+	char			**units,
+	int			*precision)
  {
  	if (debug > 1)
  		goto no_prefix;
+	*precision = 1;
  	if (number > 1000000000000ULL) {
  		*units = "T";
  		return number / 1000000000000.0;
@@ -220,6 +222,7 @@ auto_units(
no_prefix:
  	*units = "";
+	*precision = 0;
  	return number;
  }
diff --git a/scrub/common.h b/scrub/common.h
index 5a43ac0c..e85a0333 100644
--- a/scrub/common.h
+++ b/scrub/common.h
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ debug_tweak_on(
double timeval_subtract(struct timeval *tv1, struct timeval *tv2);
  double auto_space_units(unsigned long long kilobytes, char **units);
-double auto_units(unsigned long long number, char **units);
+double auto_units(unsigned long long number, char **units, int *precision);
  unsigned int scrub_nproc(struct scrub_ctx *ctx);
  unsigned int scrub_nproc_workqueue(struct scrub_ctx *ctx);
diff --git a/scrub/phase7.c b/scrub/phase7.c
index cac0c75a..504a6927 100644
--- a/scrub/phase7.c
+++ b/scrub/phase7.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ xfs_scan_summary(
  	unsigned long long		f_free;
  	bool				moveon;
  	bool				complain;
+	int				ip;
  	int				error;
/* Flush everything out to disk before we start counting. */
@@ -176,27 +177,27 @@ xfs_scan_summary(
  		if (used_rt || stat_rt) {
  			d = auto_space_units(used_data, &du);
  			r = auto_space_units(used_rt, &ru);
-			i = auto_units(used_files, &iu);
+			i = auto_units(used_files, &iu, &ip);
  			fprintf(stdout,
-_("%.1f%s data used;  %.1f%s realtime data used;  %.2f%s inodes used.\n"),
-					d, du, r, ru, i, iu);
+_("%.1f%s data used;  %.1f%s realtime data used;  %.*f%s inodes used.\n"),
+					d, du, r, ru, ip, i, iu);
  			d = auto_space_units(stat_data, &du);
  			r = auto_space_units(stat_rt, &ru);
-			i = auto_units(counted_inodes, &iu);
+			i = auto_units(counted_inodes, &iu, &ip);
  			fprintf(stdout,
-_("%.1f%s data found; %.1f%s realtime data found; %.2f%s inodes found.\n"),
-					d, du, r, ru, i, iu);
+_("%.1f%s data found; %.1f%s realtime data found; %.*f%s inodes found.\n"),
+					d, du, r, ru, ip, i, iu);

Just a suggestion:
Is plumbing in the extra precision parameter really preferable to just doing something like (i == (int)i ? 0 : 1) Or maybe a precision macro or something.

Otherwise looks fine.

Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
  		} else {
  			d = auto_space_units(used_data, &du);
-			i = auto_units(used_files, &iu);
+			i = auto_units(used_files, &iu, &ip);
  			fprintf(stdout,
-_("%.1f%s data used;  %.1f%s inodes used.\n"),
-					d, du, i, iu);
+_("%.1f%s data used;  %.*f%s inodes used.\n"),
+					d, du, ip, i, iu);
  			d = auto_space_units(stat_data, &du);
-			i = auto_units(counted_inodes, &iu);
+			i = auto_units(counted_inodes, &iu, &ip);
  			fprintf(stdout,
-_("%.1f%s data found; %.1f%s inodes found.\n"),
-					d, du, i, iu);
+_("%.1f%s data found; %.*f%s inodes found.\n"),
+					d, du, ip, i, iu);
  		}
  		fflush(stdout);
  	}
@@ -210,12 +211,13 @@ _("%.1f%s data found; %.1f%s inodes found.\n"),
  			_("checked inodes"))) {
  		double		i1, i2;
  		char		*i1u, *i2u;
+		int		i1p, i2p;
- i1 = auto_units(counted_inodes, &i1u);
-		i2 = auto_units(ctx->inodes_checked, &i2u);
+		i1 = auto_units(counted_inodes, &i1u, &i1p);
+		i2 = auto_units(ctx->inodes_checked, &i2u, &i2p);
  		fprintf(stdout,
-_("%.1f%s inodes counted; %.1f%s inodes checked.\n"),
-				i1, i1u, i2, i2u);
+_("%.*f%s inodes counted; %.*f%s inodes checked.\n"),
+				i1p, i1, i1u, i2p, i2, i2u);
  		fflush(stdout);
  	}



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux