On 10/23/18 3:16 AM, Jan Tulak wrote: >> I'm not a huge fan of "fix buffer overflows by making them arbitrarily >> bigger" - can we use i.e. snprintf to make sure it won't happen again, >> and maybe size them based on ... something, instead of "eh, [5000] is >> hopefully enough?" > I based the new size on gcc outputs, it said how much it can overflow. > But I checked the numbers only once or twice and didn't verify it for > other reports. It's always possible that I'm wrong and I'm missing something. :) What did gcc say for the cases I pointed out? > Sure. Well, back to the drawing board. Eh not entirely, just recheck some stuff. Just make sure you keep the big picture in mine when you're looking at coverity reports. Thanks, -Eric
