On 10/6/18 10:28 AM, Dave Howorth wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:22:37 -0500 > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for your reply, Eric. > >> The log is dirty as expected. But at least xfs_repair thinks it is an >> xfs filesystem, and it looks intact. >> >> Try >> >> # mount /dev/dm-3 /srv/live-tv > > Hmm, that worked. Thanks. I'm not sure why that worked when my attempt > failed, although I do see in dmesg: > > [ 467.743699] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, no debug enabled > [ 467.744733] XFS (dm-3): unknown mount option [noacl]. > > So is that also the reason it failed at boot? I'm surprised because > that would seem to imply it's never been mounted using the information > in /etc/fstab before. I suppose it is possible because I only created > the filesystem a little while ago. Good news if so, since I can resume > mounting by label. Oh, yep, I didn't see the "noacl" in fstab. That's not a valid xfs mount option. Don't know why its' in fstab or how things were working before. >> and if that fails, type "dmesg" to show the kernel message, look >> towards the end to see what it thinks went wrong. > >> Look at the end of "dmesg" output when mount fails. >> >> -Eric > > Thanks again, Dave > > PS What's the list etiquette here about replies? I use claws and both > Reply and Reply-List would send my reply just to Eric, so I did > Reply-All. I just did a quick search for list etiquette for the list > but didn't see anything obvious. Reply all is fine as far as I'm concerned. -Eric
