On 08/08/2018 01:53 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 07-08-18 15:11:43, Dave Jiang wrote: >> This patch is the duplicate of ross's fix for ext4 for xfs. >> >> If the refcount of a page is lowered between the time that it is returned >> by dax_busy_page() and when the refcount is again checked in >> xfs_break_layouts() => ___wait_var_event(), the waiting function >> xfs_wait_dax_page() will never be called. This means that >> xfs_break_layouts() will still have 'retry' set to false, so we'll stop >> looping and never check the refcount of other pages in this inode. >> >> Instead, always continue looping as long as dax_layout_busy_page() gives us >> a page which it found with an elevated refcount. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> > > The patch looks good to me. You can add: > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Just one minor nit below: > >> @@ -746,9 +744,10 @@ xfs_break_dax_layouts( >> if (!page) >> return 0; >> >> + *did_unlock = true; > > I think it would be more understandable to name the argument of > xfs_break_dax_layouts() as 'retry' instead of 'did_unlock' as it's not > about unlocking anymore. Thanks for the review Jan! I will change. I was trying to decide between less code change vs more clear definition. :) > > Honza > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
