On 7/30/18 5:30 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:25:40PM +0200, adam_kalisz wrote: >> Dear Darrick, >> >> I wanted to have a look at the recent new features being added to XFS and >> stumbled on the fact, that Google presents me first with the old website [0] >> and starting on page 2 of the web results (for the desperate) with the >> current website [1]. >> >> It would be most helpful to write some notice to the old website and the >> "Getting the latest source code" should point to the current git-repo. It >> cost me some time to realize, there is something wrong, because the git log >> ended at about 4.9 kernel (~2016) when the infrastructure from sgi probably >> got left behind. Also maybe highlight, that the current repo ist xfs-linux >> and NOT linux-xfs! It might help some of your possible future colleagues to >> get started with XFS. > > Sorry about that -- I'll ask those who have write access to xfs.org to > update the links. In the long run I'd rather just move all the > documentation and FAQ into the kernel source itself, especially since it > all now lives on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ ... yeah ... As a general PSA, the wiki is known to be bitrotting. It's impossible to add new editors, for example. It'll eventually probably go away entirely. I've fixed up a couple things Darrick asked me to do, but maybe we should just put a big <blink>THIS WIKI IS BITROTTING</blink> at the top and be done with it. -Eric > --D > >> TL;DR: >> Please make sure the XFS development is more visible by ensuring that most >> prominent references point to the current repository and website. >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
