Re: [PATCH 03/16] xfs: refactor the xrep_extent_list into xfs_bitmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:19:48PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> As mentioned previously, the xrep_extent_list basically implements a
> bitmap with two functions: set and disjoint union.  Rename all these
> functions to xfs_bitmap to shorten the name and make it more obvious
> what we're doing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c |  173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.h |   34 ++++------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c |   85 +++++++++++-------------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/repair.h |    8 +-
>  fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h  |    1 
>  5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c
> index a7c2f4773f98..4840f5a1e179 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c
...
> @@ -82,117 +84,118 @@ xrep_btree_extent_cmp(
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Remove all the blocks mentioned in @sublist from the extents in @exlist.
> + * Remove all the blocks mentioned in @sub from the extents in @bitmap.
>   *
>   * The intent is that callers will iterate the rmapbt for all of its records
> - * for a given owner to generate @exlist; and iterate all the blocks of the
> + * for a given owner to generate @bitmap; and iterate all the blocks of the
>   * metadata structures that are not being rebuilt and have the same rmapbt
> - * owner to generate @sublist.  This routine subtracts all the extents
> - * mentioned in sublist from all the extents linked in @exlist, which leaves
> - * @exlist as the list of blocks that are not accounted for, which we assume
> + * owner to generate @sub.  This routine subtracts all the extents
> + * mentioned in sub from all the extents linked in @bitmap, which leaves
> + * @bitmap as the list of blocks that are not accounted for, which we assume
>   * are the dead blocks of the old metadata structure.  The blocks mentioned in
> - * @exlist can be reaped.
> + * @bitmap can be reaped.
> + *
> + * This is the logical equivalent of bitmap &= ~sub.
>   */
>  #define LEFT_ALIGNED	(1 << 0)
>  #define RIGHT_ALIGNED	(1 << 1)
>  int
> -xrep_subtract_extents(
> -	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
> -	struct xrep_extent_list	*exlist,
> -	struct xrep_extent_list	*sublist)
> +xfs_bitmap_disunion(
> +	struct xfs_bitmap	*bitmap,
> +	struct xfs_bitmap	*sub)
>  {
>  	struct list_head	*lp;
> -	struct xrep_extent	*ex;
> -	struct xrep_extent	*newex;
> -	struct xrep_extent	*subex;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*br;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*new_br;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*sub_br;
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		sub_fsb;
> -	xfs_extlen_t		sub_len;
> +	xfs_fsblock_t		sub_len;
>  	int			state;
>  	int			error = 0;
>  
> -	if (list_empty(&exlist->list) || list_empty(&sublist->list))
> +	if (list_empty(&bitmap->list) || list_empty(&sub->list))
>  		return 0;
> -	ASSERT(!list_empty(&sublist->list));
> +	ASSERT(!list_empty(&sub->list));
>  
> -	list_sort(NULL, &exlist->list, xrep_btree_extent_cmp);
> -	list_sort(NULL, &sublist->list, xrep_btree_extent_cmp);
> +	list_sort(NULL, &bitmap->list, xrep_btree_extent_cmp);
> +	list_sort(NULL, &sub->list, xrep_btree_extent_cmp);

Still a couple xrep_ function names here. I guess I'm not clear on how
generic this is intended to be..? FWIW, the xfs_bitmap->fsbno name stood
out a bit to me as well (as opposed to something more generic like ->key
or whatever).

Brian

>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Now that we've sorted both lists, we iterate exlist once, rolling
> -	 * forward through sublist and/or exlist as necessary until we find an
> +	 * Now that we've sorted both lists, we iterate bitmap once, rolling
> +	 * forward through sub and/or bitmap as necessary until we find an
>  	 * overlap or reach the end of either list.  We do not reset lp to the
> -	 * head of exlist nor do we reset subex to the head of sublist.  The
> +	 * head of bitmap nor do we reset sub_br to the head of sub.  The
>  	 * list traversal is similar to merge sort, but we're deleting
>  	 * instead.  In this manner we avoid O(n^2) operations.
>  	 */
> -	subex = list_first_entry(&sublist->list, struct xrep_extent,
> +	sub_br = list_first_entry(&sub->list, struct xfs_bitmap_range,
>  			list);
> -	lp = exlist->list.next;
> -	while (lp != &exlist->list) {
> -		ex = list_entry(lp, struct xrep_extent, list);
> +	lp = bitmap->list.next;
> +	while (lp != &bitmap->list) {
> +		br = list_entry(lp, struct xfs_bitmap_range, list);
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Advance subex and/or ex until we find a pair that
> +		 * Advance sub_br and/or br until we find a pair that
>  		 * intersect or we run out of extents.
>  		 */
> -		while (subex->fsbno + subex->len <= ex->fsbno) {
> -			if (list_is_last(&subex->list, &sublist->list))
> +		while (sub_br->fsbno + sub_br->len <= br->fsbno) {
> +			if (list_is_last(&sub_br->list, &sub->list))
>  				goto out;
> -			subex = list_next_entry(subex, list);
> +			sub_br = list_next_entry(sub_br, list);
>  		}
> -		if (subex->fsbno >= ex->fsbno + ex->len) {
> +		if (sub_br->fsbno >= br->fsbno + br->len) {
>  			lp = lp->next;
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		/* trim subex to fit the extent we have */
> -		sub_fsb = subex->fsbno;
> -		sub_len = subex->len;
> -		if (subex->fsbno < ex->fsbno) {
> -			sub_len -= ex->fsbno - subex->fsbno;
> -			sub_fsb = ex->fsbno;
> +		/* trim sub_br to fit the extent we have */
> +		sub_fsb = sub_br->fsbno;
> +		sub_len = sub_br->len;
> +		if (sub_br->fsbno < br->fsbno) {
> +			sub_len -= br->fsbno - sub_br->fsbno;
> +			sub_fsb = br->fsbno;
>  		}
> -		if (sub_len > ex->len)
> -			sub_len = ex->len;
> +		if (sub_len > br->len)
> +			sub_len = br->len;
>  
>  		state = 0;
> -		if (sub_fsb == ex->fsbno)
> +		if (sub_fsb == br->fsbno)
>  			state |= LEFT_ALIGNED;
> -		if (sub_fsb + sub_len == ex->fsbno + ex->len)
> +		if (sub_fsb + sub_len == br->fsbno + br->len)
>  			state |= RIGHT_ALIGNED;
>  		switch (state) {
>  		case LEFT_ALIGNED:
>  			/* Coincides with only the left. */
> -			ex->fsbno += sub_len;
> -			ex->len -= sub_len;
> +			br->fsbno += sub_len;
> +			br->len -= sub_len;
>  			break;
>  		case RIGHT_ALIGNED:
>  			/* Coincides with only the right. */
> -			ex->len -= sub_len;
> +			br->len -= sub_len;
>  			lp = lp->next;
>  			break;
>  		case LEFT_ALIGNED | RIGHT_ALIGNED:
>  			/* Total overlap, just delete ex. */
>  			lp = lp->next;
> -			list_del(&ex->list);
> -			kmem_free(ex);
> +			list_del(&br->list);
> +			kmem_free(br);
>  			break;
>  		case 0:
>  			/*
>  			 * Deleting from the middle: add the new right extent
>  			 * and then shrink the left extent.
>  			 */
> -			newex = kmem_alloc(sizeof(struct xrep_extent),
> +			new_br = kmem_alloc(sizeof(struct xfs_bitmap_range),
>  					KM_MAYFAIL);
> -			if (!newex) {
> +			if (!new_br) {
>  				error = -ENOMEM;
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> -			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&newex->list);
> -			newex->fsbno = sub_fsb + sub_len;
> -			newex->len = ex->fsbno + ex->len - newex->fsbno;
> -			list_add(&newex->list, &ex->list);
> -			ex->len = sub_fsb - ex->fsbno;
> +			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_br->list);
> +			new_br->fsbno = sub_fsb + sub_len;
> +			new_br->len = br->fsbno + br->len - new_br->fsbno;
> +			list_add(&new_br->list, &br->list);
> +			br->len = sub_fsb - br->fsbno;
>  			lp = lp->next;
>  			break;
>  		default:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.h
> index 1038157695a8..3c39900e9269 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.h
> @@ -6,32 +6,28 @@
>  #ifndef __XFS_SCRUB_BITMAP_H__
>  #define __XFS_SCRUB_BITMAP_H__
>  
> -struct xrep_extent {
> +struct xfs_bitmap_range {
>  	struct list_head	list;
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		fsbno;
> -	xfs_extlen_t		len;
> +	xfs_fsblock_t		len;
>  };
>  
> -struct xrep_extent_list {
> +struct xfs_bitmap {
>  	struct list_head	list;
>  };
>  
> -static inline void
> -xrep_init_extent_list(
> -	struct xrep_extent_list		*exlist)
> -{
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&exlist->list);
> -}
> +void xfs_bitmap_init(struct xfs_bitmap *bitmap);
> +void xfs_bitmap_destroy(struct xfs_bitmap *bitmap);
>  
> -#define for_each_xrep_extent_safe(rbe, n, exlist) \
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe((rbe), (n), &(exlist)->list, list)
> -int xrep_collect_btree_extent(struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *btlist, xfs_fsblock_t fsbno,
> -		xfs_extlen_t len);
> -void xrep_cancel_btree_extents(struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *btlist);
> -int xrep_subtract_extents(struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *exlist,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *sublist);
> +#define for_each_xfs_bitmap_extent(bex, n, bitmap) \
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe((bex), (n), &(bitmap)->list, list)
> +
> +#define for_each_xfs_bitmap_block(fsbno, bex, n, bitmap) \
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe((bex), (n), &(bitmap)->list, list) \
> +		for (fsbno = bex->fsbno; fsbno < bex->fsbno + bex->len; fsbno++)
> +
> +int xfs_bitmap_set(struct xfs_bitmap *bitmap, xfs_fsblock_t fsbno,
> +		xfs_fsblock_t len);
> +int xfs_bitmap_disunion(struct xfs_bitmap *bitmap, struct xfs_bitmap *sub);
>  
>  #endif	/* __XFS_SCRUB_BITMAP_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> index 27a904ef6189..85b048b341a0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
> @@ -368,17 +368,17 @@ xrep_init_btblock(
>   *
>   * However, that leaves the matter of removing all the metadata describing the
>   * old broken structure.  For primary metadata we use the rmap data to collect
> - * every extent with a matching rmap owner (exlist); we then iterate all other
> + * every extent with a matching rmap owner (bitmap); we then iterate all other
>   * metadata structures with the same rmap owner to collect the extents that
> - * cannot be removed (sublist).  We then subtract sublist from exlist to
> + * cannot be removed (sublist).  We then subtract sublist from bitmap to
>   * derive the blocks that were used by the old btree.  These blocks can be
>   * reaped.
>   *
>   * For rmapbt reconstructions we must use different tactics for extent
>   * collection.  First we iterate all primary metadata (this excludes the old
>   * rmapbt, obviously) to generate new rmap records.  The gaps in the rmap
> - * records are collected as exlist.  The bnobt records are collected as
> - * sublist.  As with the other btrees we subtract sublist from exlist, and the
> + * records are collected as bitmap.  The bnobt records are collected as
> + * sublist.  As with the other btrees we subtract sublist from bitmap, and the
>   * result (since the rmapbt lives in the free space) are the blocks from the
>   * old rmapbt.
>   *
> @@ -386,11 +386,11 @@ xrep_init_btblock(
>   *
>   * Now that we've constructed a new btree to replace the damaged one, we want
>   * to dispose of the blocks that (we think) the old btree was using.
> - * Previously, we used the rmapbt to collect the extents (exlist) with the
> + * Previously, we used the rmapbt to collect the extents (bitmap) with the
>   * rmap owner corresponding to the tree we rebuilt, collected extents for any
>   * blocks with the same rmap owner that are owned by another data structure
> - * (sublist), and subtracted sublist from exlist.  In theory the extents
> - * remaining in exlist are the old btree's blocks.
> + * (sublist), and subtracted sublist from bitmap.  In theory the extents
> + * remaining in bitmap are the old btree's blocks.
>   *
>   * Unfortunately, it's possible that the btree was crosslinked with other
>   * blocks on disk.  The rmap data can tell us if there are multiple owners, so
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ xrep_init_btblock(
>   * If there are no rmap records at all, we also free the block.  If the btree
>   * being rebuilt lives in the free space (bnobt/cntbt/rmapbt) then there isn't
>   * supposed to be a rmap record and everything is ok.  For other btrees there
> - * had to have been an rmap entry for the block to have ended up on @exlist,
> + * had to have been an rmap entry for the block to have ended up on @bitmap,
>   * so if it's gone now there's something wrong and the fs will shut down.
>   *
>   * Note: If there are multiple rmap records with only the same rmap owner as
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ xrep_init_btblock(
>   * The caller is responsible for locking the AG headers for the entire rebuild
>   * operation so that nothing else can sneak in and change the AG state while
>   * we're not looking.  We also assume that the caller already invalidated any
> - * buffers associated with @exlist.
> + * buffers associated with @bitmap.
>   */
>  
>  /*
> @@ -429,13 +429,12 @@ xrep_init_btblock(
>  int
>  xrep_invalidate_blocks(
>  	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
> -	struct xrep_extent_list	*exlist)
> +	struct xfs_bitmap	*bitmap)
>  {
> -	struct xrep_extent	*rex;
> -	struct xrep_extent	*n;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*bmr;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*n;
>  	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		fsbno;
> -	xfs_agblock_t		i;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * For each block in each extent, see if there's an incore buffer for
> @@ -445,18 +444,16 @@ xrep_invalidate_blocks(
>  	 * because we never own those; and if we can't TRYLOCK the buffer we
>  	 * assume it's owned by someone else.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_xrep_extent_safe(rex, n, exlist) {
> -		for (fsbno = rex->fsbno, i = rex->len; i > 0; fsbno++, i--) {
> -			/* Skip AG headers and post-EOFS blocks */
> -			if (!xfs_verify_fsbno(sc->mp, fsbno))
> -				continue;
> -			bp = xfs_buf_incore(sc->mp->m_ddev_targp,
> -					XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(sc->mp, fsbno),
> -					XFS_FSB_TO_BB(sc->mp, 1), XBF_TRYLOCK);
> -			if (bp) {
> -				xfs_trans_bjoin(sc->tp, bp);
> -				xfs_trans_binval(sc->tp, bp);
> -			}
> +	for_each_xfs_bitmap_block(fsbno, bmr, n, bitmap) {
> +		/* Skip AG headers and post-EOFS blocks */
> +		if (!xfs_verify_fsbno(sc->mp, fsbno))
> +			continue;
> +		bp = xfs_buf_incore(sc->mp->m_ddev_targp,
> +				XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(sc->mp, fsbno),
> +				XFS_FSB_TO_BB(sc->mp, 1), XBF_TRYLOCK);
> +		if (bp) {
> +			xfs_trans_bjoin(sc->tp, bp);
> +			xfs_trans_binval(sc->tp, bp);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -519,9 +516,9 @@ xrep_put_freelist(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/* Dispose of a single metadata block. */
> +/* Dispose of a single block. */
>  STATIC int
> -xrep_dispose_btree_block(
> +xrep_reap_block(
>  	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
>  	xfs_fsblock_t		fsbno,
>  	struct xfs_owner_info	*oinfo,
> @@ -593,41 +590,35 @@ xrep_dispose_btree_block(
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> -/* Dispose of btree blocks from an old per-AG btree. */
> +/* Dispose of every block of every extent in the bitmap. */
>  int
> -xrep_reap_btree_extents(
> +xrep_reap_extents(
>  	struct xfs_scrub	*sc,
> -	struct xrep_extent_list	*exlist,
> +	struct xfs_bitmap	*bitmap,
>  	struct xfs_owner_info	*oinfo,
>  	enum xfs_ag_resv_type	type)
>  {
> -	struct xrep_extent	*rex;
> -	struct xrep_extent	*n;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*bmr;
> +	struct xfs_bitmap_range	*n;
> +	xfs_fsblock_t		fsbno;
>  	int			error = 0;
>  
>  	ASSERT(xfs_sb_version_hasrmapbt(&sc->mp->m_sb));
>  
> -	/* Dispose of every block from the old btree. */
> -	for_each_xrep_extent_safe(rex, n, exlist) {
> +	for_each_xfs_bitmap_block(fsbno, bmr, n, bitmap) {
>  		ASSERT(sc->ip != NULL ||
> -		       XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, rex->fsbno) == sc->sa.agno);
> -
> +		       XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, fsbno) == sc->sa.agno);
>  		trace_xrep_dispose_btree_extent(sc->mp,
> -				XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, rex->fsbno),
> -				XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(sc->mp, rex->fsbno), rex->len);
> +				XFS_FSB_TO_AGNO(sc->mp, fsbno),
> +				XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(sc->mp, fsbno), 1);
>  
> -		for (; rex->len > 0; rex->len--, rex->fsbno++) {
> -			error = xrep_dispose_btree_block(sc, rex->fsbno,
> -					oinfo, type);
> -			if (error)
> -				goto out;
> -		}
> -		list_del(&rex->list);
> -		kmem_free(rex);
> +		error = xrep_reap_block(sc, fsbno, oinfo, type);
> +		if (error)
> +			goto out;
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	xrep_cancel_btree_extents(sc, exlist);
> +	xfs_bitmap_destroy(bitmap);
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.h
> index a3d491a438f4..5a4e92221916 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.h
> @@ -27,13 +27,11 @@ int xrep_init_btblock(struct xfs_scrub *sc, xfs_fsblock_t fsb,
>  		struct xfs_buf **bpp, xfs_btnum_t btnum,
>  		const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops);
>  
> -struct xrep_extent_list;
> +struct xfs_bitmap;
>  
>  int xrep_fix_freelist(struct xfs_scrub *sc, bool can_shrink);
> -int xrep_invalidate_blocks(struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *btlist);
> -int xrep_reap_btree_extents(struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> -		struct xrep_extent_list *exlist,
> +int xrep_invalidate_blocks(struct xfs_scrub *sc, struct xfs_bitmap *btlist);
> +int xrep_reap_extents(struct xfs_scrub *sc, struct xfs_bitmap *exlist,
>  		struct xfs_owner_info *oinfo, enum xfs_ag_resv_type type);
>  
>  struct xrep_find_ag_btree {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h
> index 93db22c39b51..4e20f0e48232 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h
> @@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xrep_extent_class, name, \
>  		 xfs_agblock_t agbno, xfs_extlen_t len), \
>  	TP_ARGS(mp, agno, agbno, len))
>  DEFINE_REPAIR_EXTENT_EVENT(xrep_dispose_btree_extent);
> -DEFINE_REPAIR_EXTENT_EVENT(xrep_collect_btree_extent);
>  DEFINE_REPAIR_EXTENT_EVENT(xrep_agfl_insert);
>  
>  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xrep_rmap_class,
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux