Re: [Cluster-devel] iomap preparations for GFS2 v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15 June 2018 at 10:31, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/06/18 09:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:04:38PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>>>
>>> I saw that you've pushed this onto the gfs2-iomap branch in your xfs
>>> repository. I've rebased the gfs2 iomap-write branch onto that;
>>> there's a trivial patch for adding a private pointer to struct iomap
>>> at the head of that branch that would sense to move to the shared
>>> branch as well now.
>>
>> Please send that patch out ASAP.
>>
>>> The next step would probably be to start using iomap_readpage /
>>> iomap_readpages in gfs2 for block size == page size. This requires
>>> adding inline data support to iomap_readpage which is trivial, but
>>> because of gfs2's reliance on buffer heads, that alone isn't enough.
>>
>> Is it?  At least for block size == page size we will only call
>> readpage on a pristine, newly allocated page.  So buffer heads won't
>> be in the game at that point, and the iomap buffered write code will
>> just allocate them for you once we start a write operation, or take
>> a page fault that makes the page writable.

What I'm seeing in the readpage address space operation is pages which
are not PageUptodate(), with a page-size buffer head that is
buffer_uptodate(). The filesystem doesn't bother keeping the page
flags in sync with the buffer head flags, nothing unusual. When
iomap_readpage is called on such a page, it will replace the current
contents with what's on disk, losing the changes in memory. So we
cannot just call iomap_readpages, we need to check the buffer head
flags as well. Or, since the old code is still needed for page size !=
block size anyway, we can fall back to that for pages that have
buffers for now.

> Yes, for block size == page size, it should not be an issue to drop the use
> of buffer heads on reads in GFS2. I was fairly sure that we already did that
> in ->readpages() anyway, but it is a while since I looked at the code and my
> memory may be playing tricks on me,

I've pushed what I have so far here in case you want to have a look:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gfs2/linux-gfs2.git/log/?h=iomap-readpage

There's one remaining failure in xfstest generic/299 that I'm still
looking into.

Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux