Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: xfs_iflush_abort() can be called twice on cluster writeback failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 03:57:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When a corrupt inode is detected during xfs_iflush_cluster, we can
> get a shutdown ASSERT failure like this:
> 
> XFS (pmem1): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_symlink_shortform_verify+0x5c/0xa0, inode 0x86627 data fork
> XFS (pmem1): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x8) called from line 3372 of file fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c.  Return address = ffffffff814f4116
> XFS (pmem1): Corruption of in-memory data detected.  Shutting down filesystem
> XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c.  Return address = ffffffff814a8a88
> XFS (pmem1): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x1) called from line 222 of file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c.  Return address = ffffffff814a8ef9
> XFS (pmem1): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
> XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_isiflocked(ip), file: fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h, line: 258
> .....
> Call Trace:
>  xfs_iflush_abort+0x10a/0x110
>  xfs_iflush+0xf3/0x390
>  xfs_inode_item_push+0x126/0x1e0
>  xfsaild+0x2c5/0x890
>  kthread+0x11c/0x140
>  ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
> 
> Essentially, xfs_iflush_abort() has been called twice on the
> original inode that that was flushed. This happens because the
> inode has been flushed to teh buffer successfully via
> xfs_iflush_int(), and so when another inode is detected as corrupt
> in xfs_iflush_cluster, the buffer is marked stale and EIO, and
> iodone callbacks are run on it.
> 
> Running the iodone callbacks walks across the original inode and
> calls xfs_iflush_abort() on it. When xfs_iflush_cluster() returns
> to xfs_iflush(), it runs the error path for that function, and that
> calls xfs_iflush_abort() on the inode a second time, leading to the
> above assert failure as the inode is not flush locked anymore.
> 
> This bug has been there a long time.
> 
> The simple fix would be to just avoid calling xfs_iflush_abort() in
> xfs_iflush() if we've got a failure from xfs_iflush_cluster().
> However, xfs_iflush_cluster() has magic delwri buffer handling that
> means it may or may not have run IO completion on the buffer, and
> hence sometimes we have to call xfs_iflush_abort() from
> xfs_iflush(), and sometimes we shouldn't.
> 
> After reading through all the error paths and the delwri buffer
> code, it's clear that the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster() is
> unnecessary. If the buffer is delwri, it leaves it on the delwri
> list so that when the delwri list is submitted it sees a shutdown
> fliesystem in xfs_buf_submit() and that marks the buffer stale, EIO
> and runs IO completion. i.e. exactly what xfs+iflush_cluster() does
> when it's not a delwri buffer. Further, marking a buffer stale
> clears the _XBF_DELWRI_Q flag on the buffer, which means when
> submission of the buffer occurs, it just skips over it and releases
> it.
> 
> IOWs, the error handling in xfs_iflush_cluster doesn't need to care
> if the buffer is already on a the delwri queue or not - it just
> needs to mark the buffer stale, EIO and run completions. That means
> we can just use the easy fix for xfs_iflush() to avoid the double
> abort.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 4a2e5e13c569..4a9b90cfb8c3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -3236,7 +3236,6 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*cip;
>  	int			nr_found;
>  	int			clcount = 0;
> -	int			bufwasdelwri;
>  	int			i;
>  
>  	pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
> @@ -3360,37 +3359,22 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
>  	 * inode buffer and shut down the filesystem.
>  	 */
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	/*
> -	 * Clean up the buffer.  If it was delwri, just release it --
> -	 * brelse can handle it with no problems.  If not, shut down the
> -	 * filesystem before releasing the buffer.
> -	 */
> -	bufwasdelwri = (bp->b_flags & _XBF_DELWRI_Q);
> -	if (bufwasdelwri)
> -		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> -
>  	xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE);
>  
> -	if (!bufwasdelwri) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Just like incore_relse: if we have b_iodone functions,
> -		 * mark the buffer as an error and call them.  Otherwise
> -		 * mark it as stale and brelse.
> -		 */
> -		if (bp->b_iodone) {
> -			bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE;
> -			xfs_buf_stale(bp);
> -			xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
> -			xfs_buf_ioend(bp);
> -		} else {
> -			xfs_buf_stale(bp);
> -			xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
> -	 * Unlocks the flush lock
> +	 * We'll always have an inode attached to the buffer for completion
> +	 * process by the time we are called from xfs_iflush(). Hence we have
> +	 * always need to do IO completion processing to abort the inodes
> +	 * attached to the buffer.  handle them just like the shutdown case in
> +	 * xfs_buf_submit().
>  	 */
> +	ASSERT(bp->b_iodone);
> +	bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE;
> +	xfs_buf_stale(bp);
> +	xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
> +	xfs_buf_ioend(bp);
> +
> +	/* abort the corrupt inode, as it was not attached to the buffer */
>  	xfs_iflush_abort(cip, false);
>  	kmem_free(cilist);
>  	xfs_perag_put(pag);
> @@ -3486,12 +3470,17 @@ xfs_iflush(
>  		xfs_log_force(mp, 0);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * inode clustering:
> -	 * see if other inodes can be gathered into this write
> +	 * inode clustering: try to gather other inodes into this write
> +	 *
> +	 * Note: Any error during clustering will result in the filesystem
> +	 * being shut down and completion callbacks run on the cluster buffer.
> +	 * As we have already flushed and attached this inode to the buffer,
> +	 * it has already been aborted and released by xfs_iflush_cluster() and
> +	 * so we have no further error handling to do here.
>  	 */
>  	error = xfs_iflush_cluster(ip, bp);
>  	if (error)
> -		goto cluster_corrupt_out;
> +		return error;
>  
>  	*bpp = bp;
>  	return 0;
> @@ -3500,12 +3489,8 @@ xfs_iflush(
>  	if (bp)
>  		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
>  	xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE);
> -cluster_corrupt_out:
> -	error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>  abort_out:
> -	/*
> -	 * Unlocks the flush lock
> -	 */
> +	/* abort the corrupt inode, as it was not attached to the buffer */
>  	xfs_iflush_abort(ip, false);
>  	return error;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux