On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 01:44:49PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Although the patch looks correct, the patch description/subject is confusing
> IMHO.
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:39:59AM +0000, Kazuya Mio wrote:
>
> > xfs_quota -x -c "project -d DEPTH" stops in the middle of its operation
> > if a directory whose level is more than DEPTH was found.
> >
>
> > To set/check/clear a project quota, xfs_quota performs pre-order tree traversal
> > by using nftw(3). However, if the directory whose level is more than
> > the recursion level specified by -d option is found, the function called
> > by nftw() returns -1 and nftw() stops the tree walk.
> >
>
> I've got what you meant here, but in fact, this description just sounds to me
> as the operation should work, i.e. stop when DEPTH is hit.
>
> What you think about something like:
>
> ====
> Continue the file tree walk, even though DEPTH is hit in one or more
> sub-directory tree(s), so all sub-directory trees are processed up to DEPTH
>
> To set/check/clear a project quota, xfs_quota performs pre-order tree traversal
> by using nftw(3). However, by now, {check,setup,clear}_project, returns -1 when
> DEPTH is hit, stopping the directory tree walk.
>
> Change the return value of these functions to 0, when DEPTH is hit, so, the
> remaining sub-directory trees are also processed up to DEPTH.
I suggest contrasting the current behavior vs. the documented behavior a
little more explicitly:
"To set/check/clear a project quota, xfs_quota performs a pre-order tree
traversal by using nftw(3). The documentation states that the -d option
can be used to skip subtrees below a certain level in the directory
hierarchy. Unfortunately, {check,setup,clear}_project returns -1 when
DEPTH is hit, which stops the directory tree walk immediately. We only
wanted to skip the subtree, so return 0 instead."
Though if we're going to use FTW_ACTIONRETVAL/FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE then
there ought to be checks for the existence of those flags at build time.
--D
> ====
>
> But well, English is not my native language too, so, might be more useful if some
> native English speaker commented on it.
>
> For the patch itself:
>
> Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > The following steps show that only one directory is set a project quota,
> > even though another directory whose level is the same as the recursion level
> > isn't set a project quota.
> >
>
> > # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sdb1
> > # mount -o pquota /dev/sdb1 /mnt
> > # mkdir -p /mnt/pquota/dirA/dirAA /mnt/pquota/dirB/dirBB
> > # xfs_quota -x -c "project -d 1 -s -p /mnt/pquota 100"
> > # xfs_io -c stat /mnt/pquota/dirA | grep projid
> > fsxattr.projid = 100
> > # xfs_io -c stat /mnt/pquota/dirB | grep projid
> > fsxattr.projid = 0
> >
> > To fix above problem, if the directory whose level is more than the recursion
> > level is found, the function called by nftw() returns 0 instead of -1.
> >
> > Note that the time of tree traversal is the same as no limitation of
> > recursion level. To reduce the time, we have to use FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE
> > that is glibc-specified flag. Is it better to use this flag?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > quota/project.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/quota/project.c b/quota/project.c
> > index e4e7a01..20bc01b 100644
> > --- a/quota/project.c
> > +++ b/quota/project.c
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ check_project(
> > int fd;
> >
> > if (recurse_depth >= 0 && data->level > recurse_depth)
> > - return -1;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > if (flag == FTW_NS ){
> > exitcode = 1;
> > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ clear_project(
> > int fd;
> >
> > if (recurse_depth >= 0 && data->level > recurse_depth)
> > - return -1;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > if (flag == FTW_NS ){
> > exitcode = 1;
> > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ setup_project(
> > int fd;
> >
> > if (recurse_depth >= 0 && data->level > recurse_depth)
> > - return -1;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > if (flag == FTW_NS ){
> > exitcode = 1;
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Carlos
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
