Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: use sync buffer I/O for sync delwri queue submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 05:16:02AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 07:53:35AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Not totally sure I follow... do you essentially mean to rename
> > xfs_buf_submit_wait() -> xfs_buf_submit() and make the iowait
> > conditional on !XBF_ASYNC and absence of some new "sync_nowait"
> > parameter to the function? Could you clarify how you envision the
> > updated xfs_buf_submit() function signature to look?
> > 
> > If I'm following correctly, that seems fairly reasonable at first
> > thought. This is a separate patch though (refactoring the interface vs.
> > refactoring the implementation to fix a bug).
> 
> Well.  I'd suggest something like the patch below for patch 1:
> 

Ok, codewise I don't have much of a preference, but I don't think it's
worth redoing the regression testing and lowmem testing and whatnot just
to change how the guts are refactored here. What's the endgame? I came
up with the following on top of patch 2. Compile tested only, and I can
refold the _common() helper back into the caller and invert the
nowait logic or whatnot..

Brian

--- 8< ---

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 311ca301b7fd..89d8cedf2828 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -757,11 +757,7 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
 	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_WRITE | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
 	bp->b_flags |= flags & (XBF_READ | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
 
-	if (flags & XBF_ASYNC) {
-		xfs_buf_submit(bp);
-		return 0;
-	}
-	return xfs_buf_submit_wait(bp);
+	return xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 }
 
 xfs_buf_t *
@@ -846,7 +842,7 @@ xfs_buf_read_uncached(
 	bp->b_flags |= XBF_READ;
 	bp->b_ops = ops;
 
-	xfs_buf_submit_wait(bp);
+	xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 	if (bp->b_error) {
 		int	error = bp->b_error;
 		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
@@ -1249,7 +1245,7 @@ xfs_bwrite(
 	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ | _XBF_DELWRI_Q |
 			 XBF_WRITE_FAIL | XBF_DONE);
 
-	error = xfs_buf_submit_wait(bp);
+	error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 	if (error) {
 		xfs_force_shutdown(bp->b_target->bt_mount,
 				   SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR);
@@ -1459,7 +1455,7 @@ _xfs_buf_ioapply(
  * itself.
  */
 static int
-__xfs_buf_submit(
+__xfs_buf_submit_common(
 	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
 {
 	trace_xfs_buf_submit(bp, _RET_IP_);
@@ -1505,32 +1501,6 @@ __xfs_buf_submit(
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void
-xfs_buf_submit(
-	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
-{
-	int		error;
-
-	ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC);
-
-	/*
-	 * The caller's reference is released during I/O completion.
-	 * This occurs some time after the last b_io_remaining reference is
-	 * released, so after we drop our Io reference we have to have some
-	 * other reference to ensure the buffer doesn't go away from underneath
-	 * us. Take a direct reference to ensure we have safe access to the
-	 * buffer until we are finished with it.
-	 */
-	xfs_buf_hold(bp);
-
-	error = __xfs_buf_submit(bp);
-	if (error)
-		xfs_buf_ioend(bp);
-
-	/* Note: it is not safe to reference bp now we've dropped our ref */
-	xfs_buf_rele(bp);
-}
-
 /*
  * Wait for I/O completion of a sync buffer and return the I/O error code.
  */
@@ -1549,30 +1519,33 @@ xfs_buf_iowait(
  * Synchronous buffer IO submission path, read or write.
  */
 int
-xfs_buf_submit_wait(
-	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
+__xfs_buf_submit(
+	struct xfs_buf	*bp,
+	bool		sync_nowait)
 {
 	int		error;
 
-	ASSERT(!(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC));
-
 	/*
-	 * For synchronous IO, the IO does not inherit the submitters reference
-	 * count, nor the buffer lock. Hence we cannot release the reference we
-	 * are about to take until we've waited for all IO completion to occur,
-	 * including any xfs_buf_ioend_async() work that may be pending.
+	 * Grab a reference so the buffer does not go away underneath us. For
+	 * async buffers, I/O completion drops the callers reference, which
+	 * could occur before submission returns.
 	 */
 	xfs_buf_hold(bp);
 
-	error = __xfs_buf_submit(bp);
-	if (error)
+	error = __xfs_buf_submit_common(bp);
+	if (error) {
+		if (bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC)
+			xfs_buf_ioend(bp);
 		goto out;
-	error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
+	}
 
+	if (!(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC) && !sync_nowait)
+		error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
 out:
 	/*
-	 * all done now, we can release the hold that keeps the buffer
-	 * referenced for the entire IO.
+	 * Release the hold that keeps the buffer referenced for the entire
+	 * I/O. Note that if the buffer is async, it is not safe to reference
+	 * after this release.
 	 */
 	xfs_buf_rele(bp);
 	return error;
@@ -1984,6 +1957,7 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
 	LIST_HEAD		(submit_list);
 	int			pinned = 0;
 	struct blk_plug		plug;
+	bool			nowait = false;
 
 	list_sort(NULL, buffer_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
 
@@ -2025,12 +1999,12 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_submit_buffers(
 		if (wait_list) {
 			bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
 			list_move_tail(&bp->b_list, wait_list);
-			__xfs_buf_submit(bp);
+			nowait = true;
 		} else {
 			bp->b_flags |= XBF_ASYNC;
 			list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
-			xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 		}
+		__xfs_buf_submit(bp, nowait);
 	}
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
index d24dbd4dac39..9bae5c201003 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
@@ -298,8 +298,13 @@ extern void __xfs_buf_ioerror(struct xfs_buf *bp, int error,
 		xfs_failaddr_t failaddr);
 #define xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, err) __xfs_buf_ioerror((bp), (err), __this_address)
 extern void xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(struct xfs_buf *, const char *func);
-extern void xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp);
-extern int xfs_buf_submit_wait(struct xfs_buf *bp);
+
+extern int __xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp, bool);
+static inline int xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp)
+{
+	return __xfs_buf_submit(bp, false);
+}
+
 extern void xfs_buf_iomove(xfs_buf_t *, size_t, size_t, void *,
 				xfs_buf_rw_t);
 #define xfs_buf_zero(bp, off, len) \
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
index b181b5f57a19..724a76d87564 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ xlog_bread_noalign(
 	bp->b_io_length = nbblks;
 	bp->b_error = 0;
 
-	error = xfs_buf_submit_wait(bp);
+	error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 	if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(log->l_mp))
 		xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
 	return error;
@@ -5707,7 +5707,7 @@ xlog_do_recover(
 	bp->b_flags |= XBF_READ;
 	bp->b_ops = &xfs_sb_buf_ops;
 
-	error = xfs_buf_submit_wait(bp);
+	error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 	if (error) {
 		if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
 			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux