Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: verify extent size hint is valid in inode verifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:43:12PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There are rules for vald extent size hints. We enforce them when
> applications set them, but fuzzers violate those rules and that
> screws us over.
> 
> This results in alignment assertion failures when setting up
> allocations such as this in direct IO:
> 
> XFS: Assertion failed: ap->length, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 3432
> ....
> Call Trace:
>  xfs_bmap_btalloc+0x415/0x910
>  xfs_bmapi_write+0x71c/0x12e0
>  xfs_iomap_write_direct+0x2a9/0x420
>  xfs_file_iomap_begin+0x4dc/0xa70
>  iomap_apply+0x43/0x100
>  iomap_file_buffered_write+0x62/0x90
>  xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0xba/0x300
>  __vfs_write+0xd5/0x150
>  vfs_write+0xb6/0x180
>  ksys_write+0x45/0xa0
>  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x180
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> And from xfs_db:
> 
> core.extsize = 10380288
> 
> Which is not an integer multiple of the block size, and so violates
> Rule #7 for setting extent size hints. Validate extent size hint
> rules in the inode verifier to catch this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index f5fff1ccb61d..be197c91307b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
>  	xfs_ino_t		ino,
>  	struct xfs_dinode	*dip)
>  {
> +	xfs_failaddr_t		fa;
>  	uint16_t		mode;
>  	uint16_t		flags;
>  	uint64_t		flags2;
> @@ -501,6 +502,12 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
>  			return __this_address;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* extent size hint validation */
> +	fa = xfs_inode_validate_extsize(mp, be32_to_cpu(dip->di_extsize),
> +					mode, be32_to_cpu(dip->di_flags));

What if the cowextsize is garbage?  Do we handle that better, or do we
blow up there too?

--D

> +	if (fa)
> +		return fa;
> +
>  	/* only version 3 or greater inodes are extensively verified here */
>  	if (dip->di_version < 3)
>  		return NULL;
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux