On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:43:10PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > This patchset addresses a series of corruptions noticed in an image > provided by Wen Xu. The patches only address detecting corruptions > before they can do damage - it does not address/fix the crash the > image caused but instead prevents the bad information from getting > to the point where it can cause a crash. > > The third patch addresses a general btree record validation issue; > we should probably dirve this inwards to each btree implementation > with a ->verify_record() callout, as this patch does not address > all the places that btree records are traversed during searches. It > will catch any attempt to use a bad record that a search lands on, > however. > > Comments? So, uh, does xfs_repair catch all these things and fix them? I wonder if online repair catches and fixes them too, but I won't yet start heckling people about that. :P --D > -Dave. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
