Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix xfs_rtalloc_rec units

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:34:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> All the realtime allocation functions deal with space on the rtdev in
> units of realtime extents.  However, struct xfs_rtalloc_rec confusingly
> uses the word 'block' in the name, even though they're really extents.
> 
> Fix the naming problem and fix all the unit handling problems in the two
> existing users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

looks good.
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c      |   12 ++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c           |   13 +++++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.h         |    9 +++++++--
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> index 1855182c11ec..369eeb7a52ec 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> @@ -1036,17 +1036,17 @@ xfs_rtalloc_query_range(
>  	int				is_free;
>  	int				error = 0;
>  
> -	if (low_rec->ar_startblock > high_rec->ar_startblock)
> +	if (low_rec->ar_startext > high_rec->ar_startext)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (low_rec->ar_startblock >= mp->m_sb.sb_rextents ||
> -	    low_rec->ar_startblock == high_rec->ar_startblock)
> +	if (low_rec->ar_startext >= mp->m_sb.sb_rextents ||
> +	    low_rec->ar_startext == high_rec->ar_startext)
>  		return 0;
> -	if (high_rec->ar_startblock >= mp->m_sb.sb_rextents)
> -		high_rec->ar_startblock = mp->m_sb.sb_rextents - 1;
> +	if (high_rec->ar_startext >= mp->m_sb.sb_rextents)
> +		high_rec->ar_startext = mp->m_sb.sb_rextents - 1;
>  
>  	/* Iterate the bitmap, looking for discrepancies. */
> -	rtstart = low_rec->ar_startblock;
> -	rem = high_rec->ar_startblock - rtstart;
> +	rtstart = low_rec->ar_startext;
> +	rem = high_rec->ar_startext - rtstart;
>  	while (rem) {
>  		/* Is the first block free? */
>  		error = xfs_rtcheck_range(mp, tp, rtstart, 1, 1, &rtend,
> @@ -1056,13 +1056,13 @@ xfs_rtalloc_query_range(
>  
>  		/* How long does the extent go for? */
>  		error = xfs_rtfind_forw(mp, tp, rtstart,
> -				high_rec->ar_startblock - 1, &rtend);
> +				high_rec->ar_startext - 1, &rtend);
>  		if (error)
>  			break;
>  
>  		if (is_free) {
> -			rec.ar_startblock = rtstart;
> -			rec.ar_blockcount = rtend - rtstart + 1;
> +			rec.ar_startext = rtstart;
> +			rec.ar_extcount = rtend - rtstart + 1;
>  
>  			error = fn(tp, &rec, priv);
>  			if (error)
> @@ -1085,9 +1085,9 @@ xfs_rtalloc_query_all(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_rtalloc_rec		keys[2];
>  
> -	keys[0].ar_startblock = 0;
> -	keys[1].ar_startblock = tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextents - 1;
> -	keys[0].ar_blockcount = keys[1].ar_blockcount = 0;
> +	keys[0].ar_startext = 0;
> +	keys[1].ar_startext = tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextents - 1;
> +	keys[0].ar_extcount = keys[1].ar_extcount = 0;
>  
>  	return xfs_rtalloc_query_range(tp, &keys[0], &keys[1], fn, priv);
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> index 0fa3ef5c83b8..177d77878b0d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> @@ -66,11 +66,15 @@ xfs_scrub_rtbitmap_rec(
>  	void				*priv)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_scrub_context	*sc = priv;
> +	xfs_rtblock_t			startblock;
> +	xfs_rtblock_t			blockcount;
>  
> -	if (rec->ar_startblock + rec->ar_blockcount <= rec->ar_startblock ||
> -	    !xfs_verify_rtbno(sc->mp, rec->ar_startblock) ||
> -	    !xfs_verify_rtbno(sc->mp, rec->ar_startblock +
> -			rec->ar_blockcount - 1))
> +	startblock = rec->ar_startext * tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
> +	blockcount = rec->ar_extcount * tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
> +
> +	if (startblock + blockcount <= startblock ||
> +	    !xfs_verify_rtbno(sc->mp, startblock) ||
> +	    !xfs_verify_rtbno(sc->mp, startblock + blockcount - 1))
>  		xfs_scrub_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, 0);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> index 43cfc07996a4..92ce0e94085a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c
> @@ -465,10 +465,9 @@ xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper(
>  	struct xfs_rmap_irec		irec;
>  	xfs_daddr_t			rec_daddr;
>  
> -	rec_daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, rec->ar_startblock);
> -
> -	irec.rm_startblock = rec->ar_startblock;
> -	irec.rm_blockcount = rec->ar_blockcount;
> +	irec.rm_startblock = rec->ar_startext * mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
> +	rec_daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, irec.rm_startblock);
> +	irec.rm_blockcount = rec->ar_extcount * mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
>  	irec.rm_owner = XFS_RMAP_OWN_NULL;	/* "free" */
>  	irec.rm_offset = 0;
>  	irec.rm_flags = 0;
> @@ -534,8 +533,10 @@ xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_query(
>  
>  	xfs_ilock(tp->t_mountp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
>  
> -	alow.ar_startblock = info->low.rm_startblock;
> -	ahigh.ar_startblock = info->high.rm_startblock;
> +	alow.ar_startext = info->low.rm_startblock;
> +	ahigh.ar_startext = info->high.rm_startblock;
> +	do_div(alow.ar_startext, tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextsize);
> +	do_div(ahigh.ar_startext, tp->t_mountp->m_sb.sb_rextsize);
>  	error = xfs_rtalloc_query_range(tp, &alow, &ahigh,
>  			xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper, info);
>  	if (error)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.h
> index dfee3c991155..52632ab727f7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.h
> @@ -23,9 +23,14 @@
>  struct xfs_mount;
>  struct xfs_trans;
>  
> +/*
> + * XXX: Most of the realtime allocation functions deal in units of realtime
> + * extents, not realtime blocks.  This looks funny when paired with the type
> + * name and screams for a larger cleanup.
> + */
>  struct xfs_rtalloc_rec {
> -	xfs_rtblock_t		ar_startblock;
> -	xfs_rtblock_t		ar_blockcount;
> +	xfs_rtblock_t		ar_startext;
> +	xfs_rtblock_t		ar_extcount;
>  };
>  
>  typedef int (*xfs_rtalloc_query_range_fn)(
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux