On Wed, May 30 2018 at 2:55pm -0400, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/30/18 7:36 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > So revisiting this patchset: are you inclined to take these changes (I > > assume yes)? If so, what would you need in order to get them staged for > > 4.18? I'll start with offering my review in reply to the DM patch. I'd > > much prefer to see this level of change go in sooner rather than later. > > Yeah I'd like to take the changes, but we might have to wait for > 4.19 at this point. It'd certainly help to have the dm bits reviewed, > as they are some of the larger ones. The grunt of the others are mostly > trivial and smaller in scope. I _really_ would like to see this land for 4.18. It'll avoid downstream backport problems (due to all the churn in this patchset). As I'm sure you've seen I reviewed and Acked-by the DM patch. I mentioned I've been chatting with Kent, he is available if anything needs a v2 for whatever reason. Would you be OK adding a single sentence description to each driver's patch header (rather than leaving empty like how Kent submitted)? Or should Kent resubmit the entire set with that boilerplate header for each patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
