On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 05:29:44PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Darrick,
> I may have hit an xfs regression that shows up in 4.16 that fails
> xfstest xfs/348. I have bisected it to this commit:
> 9cfb9b47479e237d217dbcfafe034cbf98f45909 ("xfs: provide a centralized
> method for verifying inline fork data")
>
> # ./check xfs/348
> FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 skx-ntbusd 4.15.0-rc7+
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/pmem0p2
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/pmem0p2
> /mnt/xfstests_scratch
>
> xfs/348 29s ... - output mismatch (see
> /root/xfstests/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/348.out.bad)
> --- tests/xfs/348.out 2017-10-19 10:57:22.561819578 -0700
> +++ /root/xfstests/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/348.out.bad
> 2018-05-21 17:13:39.171256163 -0700
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
> would have junked entry "DIR" in directory PARENT_INO
> would have junked entry "EMPTY" in directory PARENT_INO
> would have junked entry "FIFO" in directory PARENT_INO
> -stat: 'SCRATCH_MNT/test/DIR' is a symbolic link
> +stat: cannot stat 'SCRATCH_MNT/test/DIR': Structure needs cleaning
That was fixed in (xfstests) commit 60ba1274f5d79b.
--D
> stat: 'SCRATCH_MNT/test/DATA' is a symbolic link
> stat: cannot stat 'SCRATCH_MNT/test/EMPTY': Structure needs cleaning
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/348.out
> /root/xfstests/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/348.out.bad' to see the entire
> diff)
> Ran: xfs/348
> Failures: xfs/348
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> --
>
> Dave Jiang
> Software Engineer, SSG/OTC
> Intel Corp.
> dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
