On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 05:58:43AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:45:31AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > [PATCH] loop: clear wb_err in bd_inode when detaching backing file > > Is this the right thing to do? Putting the test-suite aside for the > moment, if I have a loop device on a file and I hit a real error on the > storage backing that file, I don't see why detaching the loop device > from the file should clear the error. > > I'm really tempted to say that we should fix the test-suite to consume > the error; once it's been read by at least one reader, it won't go back > to zero, but neither will it show up for new readers. You can't detach the backing store if there are any open file descriptors (or if there is another loop device keeping the loop device open, or if there is a file system mounted on it, etc.). If you can detach the backing store, once you detach the backing store, the loop device is *gone*. The user of /dev/loop0 will very likely be a completely different backing store, so returning an error simply doesn't make any sense. There is a very good chance it will be a completely different backing store, with potentially a different user, so returning a carried over error is just going confuse, annoy, and anger the user..... - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
