On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:05:51PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:48:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:46:39PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > Since we cannot set these attributes we should special-case the > > > immutable/append on delete for symlinks, this would be consistent with > > > what we *do* allow on Linux for all filesystems. > > > > Er... So why not simply sanity-check it in places that set it on > > inodes? > > The patch is not about sanity-checks on setters though as *that* is in place > already. Its about the case where the filesystem gets corrupted and the VFS > *still* does process these attributes for symlinks and still prevents > deletion because of these attributes. ... and this corrupted fs ends up setting those flags on in-core inodes. Which is where we ought to block that. Seriously, let's make sure that ->i_flags manipulations are done by inode_set_flags() (e.g. btrfs open-codes that, apparently) and let's make _that_ check and reject those. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
