Hi, XFS developers Recently, I was told that some 32bit applications don't work on large XFS filesystems. And it is caused by ino overflow in syscalls. If I don't misunderstand libxfs/xfs_format, XFS' absolute inode number consists of agno_log -agblklog-inopblog bits. So significative bits = ROUND(log2(Disk size / AG size)) + ROUND(log2(AG size / BLK size)) + ROUND(log2(BLK size / inode size)). Right? Does it mean that it's feasible to avoid ino overflow by control of disk size, AG size, block size, inode size when mkfs even the disk will be mount with option inode64. Thanks, Su -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
