Re: [PATCH 07/12] xfs: scrub the data fork of the realtime inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:54:59AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:06:38AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The realtime bitmap and summary inodes live on the metadata device, so
> > we can scrub their data forks with the regular scrubbers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> > index 8b048f107af2..b2b4dff2660d 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtbitmap.c
> > @@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ xfs_scrub_rtbitmap(
> >  {
> >  	int				error;
> >  
> > +	/* Invoke the fork scrubber. */
> > +	error = xfs_scrub_metadata_inode_forks(sc);
> > +	if (error || (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT))
> > +		return error;
> > +
> >  	error = xfs_rtalloc_query_all(sc->tp, xfs_scrub_rtbitmap_rec, sc);
> >  	if (!xfs_scrub_fblock_process_error(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, 0, &error))
> >  		goto out;
> > @@ -95,8 +100,27 @@ int
> >  xfs_scrub_rtsummary(
> >  	struct xfs_scrub_context	*sc)
> >  {
> > +	struct xfs_inode		*rsumip = sc->mp->m_rsumip;
> > +	int				error = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We ILOCK'd the rt bitmap ip in the setup routine, now lock the
> > +	 * rt summary ip in compliance with the rt inode locking rules.
> > +	 */
> > +	xfs_ilock(rsumip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM);
> > +
> > +	/* Invoke the fork scrubber. */
> > +	sc->ip = rsumip;
> 
> I guess the ->ilock_flags are technically inconsistent at this point.
> Does that matter? If not, couldn't hurt to document that in the comment.
> ;P
> 
> I also think this would be a bit easier to follow if we just stored and
> restored an old_ip pointer on the stack (and perhaps assert that it
> matches ->m_rbmip).

Ok.  I'll update the documentation to make it clearer that we're
switching state, and restructure the code to keep sc->{ip,ilock_flags}
consistent.

--D

> Brian
> 
> > +	error = xfs_scrub_metadata_inode_forks(sc);
> > +	sc->ip = sc->mp->m_rbmip;
> > +	if (error || (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT))
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> >  	/* XXX: implement this some day */
> > -	return -ENOENT;
> > +	xfs_scrub_set_incomplete(sc);
> > +out:
> > +	xfs_iunlock(rsumip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM);
> > +	return error;
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux