Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't assert fail with AIL lock held

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't assert fail with AIL lock held
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 23:13:46 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180508034202.10136-5-david@fromorbit.com>
References: <20180508034202.10136-1-david@fromorbit.com> <20180508034202.10136-5-david@fromorbit.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

Not really excited about this, but if it helps you debugging the AIL
code:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH 0/9 v2] xfs: log item and transaction cleanups
  - From: Dave Chinner
- [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't assert fail with AIL lock held
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: WARNING: bad unlock balance in xfs_iunlock
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: get rid of the log item descriptor
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't assert fail with AIL lock held
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't assert fail with AIL lock held
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux