> Otherwise seems Ok, but kind of ugly. What about something like the > following diff (applied on top of this patch)? Still hacky, but it > avoids the multiple lock cycles for each check failure and preserves the > actual assert strings. (Untested and probably could use comment > updates..). This looks a little better. But maybe we should just replace the ASSERT statements with WARN_ON_ONCE calls to make them non-fatal but otherwise leave things as-is? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
