On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:20:42AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > We currently special case WRITE and FLUSH, but we should really > just include any command with the write bit set. This ensures > that we account DISCARD. Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c > index f92fc84b5e2c..3e34b41bcefc 100644 > --- a/block/blk-wbt.c > +++ b/block/blk-wbt.c > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int wbt_data_dir(const struct request *rq) > > if (op == REQ_OP_READ) > return READ; > - else if (op == REQ_OP_WRITE || op == REQ_OP_FLUSH) > + else if (op_is_write(op)) > return WRITE; > > /* don't account */ But this whole function smells, the return value is an array index, so instead of abusing read/write this should return 0 or 1 and be called _idx or similar. But I guess that is a question for the higher level interface. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
