Re: [PATCH 08/13] xfs: refactor xfs_qm_dqtobp and xfs_qm_dqalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 08:06:44AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Separate the disk dquot read and allocation functionality into
> two helper functions, then refactor dqread to call them directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c |  261 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> index 7154909..ef4cd56 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
...
> @@ -574,74 +532,53 @@ xfs_qm_dqread(
>  	xfs_dqid_t		id,
>  	uint			type,
>  	uint			flags,
> -	struct xfs_dquot	**O_dqpp)
> +	struct xfs_dquot	**dqpp)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_dquot	*dqp;
> -	struct xfs_disk_dquot	*ddqp;
>  	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
> -	struct xfs_trans	*tp = NULL;
> +	struct xfs_trans	*tp;
>  	int			error;
>  
>  	dqp = xfs_qm_dqinit_once(mp, id, type);
>  	trace_xfs_dqread(dqp);
>  
> -	if (flags & XFS_QMOPT_DQALLOC) {
> +	/* Try to read the buffer... */
> +	error = xfs_qm_dqread_ondisk(mp, dqp, &bp);
> +	if (error == -ENOENT && (flags & XFS_QMOPT_DQALLOC)) {
> +		/* ...or allocate a new block and buffer. */
>  		error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_qm_dqalloc,
>  				XFS_QM_DQALLOC_SPACE_RES(mp), 0, 0, &tp);
>  		if (error)
> -			goto error0;
> -	}
> +			goto err;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * get a pointer to the on-disk dquot and the buffer containing it
> -	 * dqp already knows its own type (GROUP/USER).
> -	 */
> -	error = xfs_qm_dqtobp(&tp, dqp, &ddqp, &bp, flags);
> -	if (error) {
> -		/*
> -		 * This can happen if quotas got turned off (ESRCH),
> -		 * or if the dquot didn't exist on disk and we ask to
> -		 * allocate (ENOENT).
> -		 */
> -		trace_xfs_dqread_fail(dqp);
> -		goto error1;
> -	}
> +		error = xfs_qm_dqalloc_ondisk(&tp, dqp, &bp);
> +		if (error)
> +			goto err_cancel;
>  
> -	xfs_qm_dqinit_from_buf(dqp, ddqp);
> +		error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
> +	}
> +	ASSERT(xfs_buf_islocked(bp));

Doesn't this fail if the tx commit above fails? Granted we've probably
shut down...

Otherwise looks fine modulo Christoph's comments.

Brian

P.S., I see that assert was fixed up in the next patch, but then we have
a couple of the same calls separated by the init call. That probably
should be fixed up here in any event...

> +	if (error)
> +		goto err;
>  
> -	/* Mark the buf so that this will stay incore a little longer */
> -	xfs_buf_set_ref(bp, XFS_DQUOT_REF);
> +	xfs_qm_dqinit_from_buf(dqp, bp);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * We got the buffer with a xfs_trans_read_buf() (in dqtobp())
> -	 * So we need to release with xfs_trans_brelse().
> -	 * The strategy here is identical to that of inodes; we lock
> -	 * the dquot in xfs_qm_dqget() before making it accessible to
> -	 * others. This is because dquots, like inodes, need a good level of
> -	 * concurrency, and we don't want to take locks on the entire buffers
> -	 * for dquot accesses.
> -	 * Note also that the dquot buffer may even be dirty at this point, if
> -	 * this particular dquot was repaired. We still aren't afraid to
> -	 * brelse it because we have the changes incore.
> +	 * At this point we should have a clean locked buffer.  Release the
> +	 * buffer since the incore dquot has its own copy and locking
> +	 * protocol so we needn't tie up the buffer any further.
>  	 */
>  	ASSERT(xfs_buf_islocked(bp));
> -	xfs_trans_brelse(tp, bp);
> -
> -	if (tp) {
> -		error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
> -		if (error)
> -			goto error0;
> -	}
> -
> -	*O_dqpp = dqp;
> +	xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> +	*dqpp = dqp;
>  	return error;
>  
> -error1:
> -	if (tp)
> -		xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
> -error0:
> +err_cancel:
> +	xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
> +err:
> +	trace_xfs_dqread_fail(dqp);
>  	xfs_qm_dqdestroy(dqp);
> -	*O_dqpp = NULL;
> +	*dqpp = NULL;
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux