Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: don't retry xfs_buf_find on XBF_TRYLOCK failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:21:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When looking at an event trace recently, I noticed that non-blocking
> buffer lookup attempts would fail on cached locked buffers and then
> run the slow cache-miss path. This means we are doing an xfs_buf
> allocation, lookup and free unnecessarily every time we avoid
> blocking on a locked buffer.
> 
> Fix this by changing _xfs_buf_find() to return an error status to
> the caller to indicate that we failed the lock attempt rather than
> just returning a NULL. This allows the higher level code to
> discriminate between a cache miss and an cache hit that we failed to
> lock.
> 
> This also allows us to return a -EFSCORRUPTED state if we are asked
> to look up a block number outside the range of the filesystem in
> _xfs_buf_find(), which moves us one step closer to being able to
> handle such errors in a more graceful manner at the higher levels.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good

Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 2ca8e2c7fbc4..41b386c26582 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -549,17 +549,31 @@ xfs_buf_hash_destroy(
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Look up (and insert if absent), a lockable buffer for a given
> - * range of an inode.  The buffer is returned locked. No I/O is
> - * implied by this call.
> + * Look up a buffer in the buffer cache and return it referenced and locked
> + * in @found_bp.
> + *
> + * If @new_bp is supplied and we have a lookup miss, insert @new_bp into the
> + * cache.
> + *
> + * If XBF_TRYLOCK is set in @flags, only try to lock the buffer and return
> + * -EAGAIN if we fail to lock it.
> + *
> + * Return values are:
> + *	-EFSCORRUPTED if have been supplied with an invalid address
> + *	-EAGAIN on trylock failure
> + *	-ENOENT if we fail to find a match and @new_bp was NULL
> + *	0, with @found_bp:
> + *		- @new_bp if we inserted it into the cache
> + *		- the buffer we found and locked.
>   */
> -static struct xfs_buf *
> -_xfs_buf_find(
> +static int
> +xfs_buf_find(
>  	struct xfs_buftarg	*btp,
>  	struct xfs_buf_map	*map,
>  	int			nmaps,
>  	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags,
> -	struct xfs_buf		*new_bp)
> +	struct xfs_buf		*new_bp,
> +	struct xfs_buf		**found_bp)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_perag	*pag;
>  	xfs_buf_t		*bp;
> @@ -567,6 +581,8 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
>  	xfs_daddr_t		eofs;
>  	int			i;
>  
> +	*found_bp = NULL;
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < nmaps; i++)
>  		cmap.bm_len += map[i].bm_len;
>  
> @@ -580,16 +596,11 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
>  	 */
>  	eofs = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(btp->bt_mount, btp->bt_mount->m_sb.sb_dblocks);
>  	if (cmap.bm_bn < 0 || cmap.bm_bn >= eofs) {
> -		/*
> -		 * XXX (dgc): we should really be returning -EFSCORRUPTED here,
> -		 * but none of the higher level infrastructure supports
> -		 * returning a specific error on buffer lookup failures.
> -		 */
>  		xfs_alert(btp->bt_mount,
>  			  "%s: daddr 0x%llx out of range, EOFS 0x%llx",
>  			  __func__, cmap.bm_bn, eofs);
>  		WARN_ON(1);
> -		return NULL;
> +		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>  	}
>  
>  	pag = xfs_perag_get(btp->bt_mount,
> @@ -604,19 +615,20 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
>  	}
>  
>  	/* No match found */
> -	if (new_bp) {
> -		/* the buffer keeps the perag reference until it is freed */
> -		new_bp->b_pag = pag;
> -		rhashtable_insert_fast(&pag->pag_buf_hash,
> -				       &new_bp->b_rhash_head,
> -				       xfs_buf_hash_params);
> -		spin_unlock(&pag->pag_buf_lock);
> -	} else {
> +	if (!new_bp) {
>  		XFS_STATS_INC(btp->bt_mount, xb_miss_locked);
>  		spin_unlock(&pag->pag_buf_lock);
>  		xfs_perag_put(pag);
> +		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
> -	return new_bp;
> +
> +	/* the buffer keeps the perag reference until it is freed */
> +	new_bp->b_pag = pag;
> +	rhashtable_insert_fast(&pag->pag_buf_hash, &new_bp->b_rhash_head,
> +			       xfs_buf_hash_params);
> +	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_buf_lock);
> +	*found_bp = new_bp;
> +	return 0;
>  
>  found:
>  	spin_unlock(&pag->pag_buf_lock);
> @@ -626,7 +638,7 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
>  		if (flags & XBF_TRYLOCK) {
>  			xfs_buf_rele(bp);
>  			XFS_STATS_INC(btp->bt_mount, xb_busy_locked);
> -			return NULL;
> +			return -EAGAIN;
>  		}
>  		xfs_buf_lock(bp);
>  		XFS_STATS_INC(btp->bt_mount, xb_get_locked_waited);
> @@ -646,7 +658,8 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
>  
>  	trace_xfs_buf_find(bp, flags, _RET_IP_);
>  	XFS_STATS_INC(btp->bt_mount, xb_get_locked);
> -	return bp;
> +	*found_bp = bp;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  struct xfs_buf *
> @@ -656,8 +669,14 @@ xfs_incore(
>  	size_t			numblks,
>  	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags)
>  {
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
> +	int			error;
>  	DEFINE_SINGLE_BUF_MAP(map, blkno, numblks);
> -	return _xfs_buf_find(target, &map, 1, flags, NULL);
> +
> +	error = xfs_buf_find(target, &map, 1, flags, NULL, &bp);
> +	if (error)
> +		return NULL;
> +	return bp;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -676,9 +695,27 @@ xfs_buf_get_map(
>  	struct xfs_buf		*new_bp;
>  	int			error = 0;
>  
> -	bp = _xfs_buf_find(target, map, nmaps, flags, NULL);
> -	if (likely(bp))
> +	error = xfs_buf_find(target, map, nmaps, flags, NULL, &bp);
> +
> +	switch (error) {
> +	case 0:
> +		/* cache hit */
>  		goto found;
> +	case -EAGAIN:
> +		/* cache hit, trylock failure, caller handles failure */
> +		ASSERT(flags & XBF_TRYLOCK);
> +		return NULL;
> +	case -ENOENT:
> +		/* cache miss, go for insert */
> +		break;
> +	case -EFSCORRUPTED:
> +	default:
> +		/*
> +		 * None of the higher layers understand failure types
> +		 * yet, so return NULL to signal a fatal lookup error.
> +		 */
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	new_bp = _xfs_buf_alloc(target, map, nmaps, flags);
>  	if (unlikely(!new_bp))
> @@ -690,8 +727,8 @@ xfs_buf_get_map(
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	bp = _xfs_buf_find(target, map, nmaps, flags, new_bp);
> -	if (!bp) {
> +	error = xfs_buf_find(target, map, nmaps, flags, new_bp, &bp);
> +	if (error) {
>  		xfs_buf_free(new_bp);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.16.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Carlos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux