Re: [PATCH] xfs: use hardlimit as sub-fs size if both hard/soft limits are set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:40:03AM +0800, cgxu519@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Dave, Christoph
> 
> Any objection for this?

Silence generally means "I don't really care".

Rule of thumb: if it's user visible and likely to be used in
scripts, then we have to be really careful about changing behaviour
as it can break user scripts. This ticks both boxes, so I'd be
wanting more justification than "I noticed this" as a reason for
changing it.

Darrick seems to be covering that concern just fine :)

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux