Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: don't dirty snapshot logs for unlinked inode recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:20:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:33:48PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Now that unlinked inode recovery is done outside of
> > log recovery, there is no need to dirty the log on
> > snapshots just to handle unlinked inodes.  This means
> > that readonly snapshots can be mounted without requiring
> > -o ro,norecovery to avoid the log replay that can't happen
> > on a readonly block device.
> > 
> > (unlinked inodes will just hang out in the agi buckets until
> > the next writable mount)
> 
> FWIW I put these two in a test kernel to see what would happen and
> generic/311 failures popped up.  It looked like the _check_scratch_fs
> found incorrect block counts on the snapshot(?)
> 

Interesting. Just a wild guess, but perhaps it has something to do with
lazy sb accounting..? I see we call xfs_initialize_perag_data() when
mounting an unclean fs.

Brian

> --D
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > index 93588ea..5669525 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> > @@ -1419,9 +1419,10 @@ struct proc_xfs_info {
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Second stage of a freeze. The data is already frozen so we only
> > - * need to take care of the metadata. Once that's done sync the superblock
> > - * to the log to dirty it in case of a crash while frozen. This ensures that we
> > - * will recover the unlinked inode lists on the next mount.
> > + * need to take care of the metadata.
> > + * Any unlinked inode lists will remain at this point, and be recovered
> > + * on the next writable mount if we crash while frozen, or create
> > + * a snapshot from the frozen filesystem.
> >   */
> >  STATIC int
> >  xfs_fs_freeze(
> > @@ -1431,7 +1432,7 @@ struct proc_xfs_info {
> >  
> >  	xfs_save_resvblks(mp);
> >  	xfs_quiesce_attr(mp);
> > -	return xfs_sync_sb(mp, true);
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  STATIC int
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux