On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:11:38PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:45:39PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > The struct xfs_agfl v5 header was originally introduced with
> > unexpected padding that caused the AGFL to operate with one less
> > slot than intended. The header has since been packed, but the fix
> > left an incompatibility for users who upgrade from an old kernel
> > with the unpacked header to a newer kernel with the packed header
> > while the AGFL happens to wrap around the end. The newer kernel
> > recognizes one extra slot at the physical end of the AGFL that the
> > previous kernel did not. The new kernel will eventually attempt to
> > allocate a block from that slot, which contains invalid data, and
> > cause a crash.
> >
> > This condition can be detected by comparing the active range of the
> > AGFL to the count. While this detects a padding mismatch, it can
> > also trigger false positives for unrelated flcount corruption. Since
> > we cannot distinguish a size mismatch due to padding from unrelated
> > corruption, we can't trust the AGFL enough to simply repopulate the
> > empty slot.
> >
> > Instead, avoid unnecessarily complex detection logic and and use a
> > solution that can handle any form of flcount corruption that slips
> > through read verifiers: distrust the entire AGFL and reset it to an
> > empty state. Any valid blocks within the AGFL are intentionally
> > leaked. This requires xfs_repair to rectify (which was already
> > necessary based on the state the AGFL was found in). The reset
> > mitigates the side effect of the padding mismatch problem from a
> > filesystem crash to a free space accounting inconsistency. The
> > generic approach also means that this patch can be safely backported
> > to kernels with or without a packed struct xfs_agfl.
> >
> > Check the AGF for an invalid freelist count on initial read from
> > disk. If detected, set a flag on the xfs_perag to indicate that a
> > reset is required before the AGFL can be used. In the first
> > transaction that attempts to use a flagged AGFL, reset it to empty,
> > warn the user about the inconsistency and allow the freelist fixup
> > code to repopulate the AGFL with new blocks. The xfs_perag flag is
> > cleared to eliminate the need for repeated checks on each block
> > allocation operation.
> >
> > Fixes: 96f859d52bcb ("libxfs: pack the agfl header structure so XFS_AGFL_SIZE is correct")
> > CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linuxxfs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > - Function rename and logic cleanup.
> > - CC stable.
> > v1: https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=152104784709048&w=2
> > - Use a simplified AGFL reset mechanism.
> > - Trigger on AGFL fixup rather than get/put.
> > - Various refactors, cleanups and comments.
> > rfc: https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=152045069616434&w=2
> >
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 1 +
> > fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 9 ++++-
> > 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > index 3db90b707fb2..39387bdd225d 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > @@ -2063,6 +2063,93 @@ xfs_alloc_space_available(
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * Check the agfl fields of the agf for inconsistency or corruption. The purpose
> > + * is to detect an agfl header padding mismatch between current and early v5
> > + * kernels. This problem manifests as a 1-slot size difference between the
> > + * on-disk flcount and the active [first, last] range of a wrapped agfl. This
> > + * may also catch variants of agfl count corruption unrelated to padding. Either
> > + * way, we'll reset the agfl and warn the user.
> > + *
> > + * Return true if a reset is required before the agfl can be used, false
> > + * otherwise.
> > + */
> > +static bool
> > +xfs_agfl_needs_reset(
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > + struct xfs_agf *agf)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t f = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst);
> > + uint32_t l = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_fllast);
> > + uint32_t c = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount);
> > + int agfl_size = xfs_agfl_size(mp);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Should this be XFS_AGFL_SIZE(mp)? Otherwise I got compile error (based
> on 4.15-rc5 kernel):
>
This patch was rebased onto for-next which now includes commit
a78ee256c325e ("xfs: convert XFS_AGFL_SIZE to a helper function"). That
commit refactors the macro into a helper function.
Brian
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c: In function ‘xfs_agfl_needs_reset’:
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2075:20: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xfs_agfl_size’; did you mean ‘xfs_agfl_verify’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> int agfl_size = xfs_agfl_size(mp);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> xfs_agfl_verify
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> > + int active;
> > +
> > + /* no agfl header on v4 supers */
> > + if (!xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The agf read verifier catches severe corruption of these fields.
> > + * Repeat some sanity checks to cover a packed -> unpacked mismatch if
> > + * the verifier allows it.
> > + */
> > + if (f >= agfl_size || l >= agfl_size)
> > + return true;
> > + if (c > agfl_size)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check consistency between the on-disk count and the active range. An
> > + * agfl padding mismatch manifests as an inconsistent flcount.
> > + */
> > + if (c && l >= f)
> > + active = l - f + 1;
> > + else if (c)
> > + active = agfl_size - f + l + 1;
> > + else
> > + active = 0;
> > +
> > + return active != c;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Reset the agfl to an empty state. Ignore/drop any existing blocks since the
> > + * agfl content cannot be trusted. Warn the user that a repair is required to
> > + * recover leaked blocks.
> > + *
> > + * The purpose of this mechanism is to handle filesystems affected by the agfl
> > + * header padding mismatch problem. A reset keeps the filesystem online with a
> > + * relatively minor free space accounting inconsistency rather than suffer the
> > + * inevitable crash from use of an invalid agfl block.
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +xfs_agfl_reset(
> > + struct xfs_trans *tp,
> > + struct xfs_buf *agbp,
> > + struct xfs_perag *pag)
> > +{
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
> > + struct xfs_agf *agf = XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(agbp);
> > +
> > + ASSERT(pag->pagf_agflreset);
> > + trace_xfs_agfl_reset(mp, agf, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +
> > + xfs_warn(mp,
> > + "WARNING: Reset corrupted AGFL on AG %u. %d blocks leaked. "
> > + "Please unmount and run xfs_repair.",
> > + pag->pag_agno, pag->pagf_flcount);
> > +
> > + agf->agf_flfirst = 0;
> > + agf->agf_fllast = cpu_to_be32(xfs_agfl_size(mp) - 1);
>
> Same here.
>
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
> > + agf->agf_flcount = 0;
> > + xfs_alloc_log_agf(tp, agbp, XFS_AGF_FLFIRST | XFS_AGF_FLLAST |
> > + XFS_AGF_FLCOUNT);
> > +
> > + pag->pagf_flcount = 0;
> > + pag->pagf_agflreset = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > * Decide whether to use this allocation group for this allocation.
> > * If so, fix up the btree freelist's size.
> > */
> > @@ -2123,6 +2210,10 @@ xfs_alloc_fix_freelist(
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* reset a padding mismatched agfl before final free space check */
> > + if (pag->pagf_agflreset)
> > + xfs_agfl_reset(tp, agbp, pag);
> > +
> > /* If there isn't enough total space or single-extent, reject it. */
> > need = xfs_alloc_min_freelist(mp, pag);
> > if (!xfs_alloc_space_available(args, need, flags))
> > @@ -2279,6 +2370,7 @@ xfs_alloc_get_freelist(
> > agf->agf_flfirst = 0;
> >
> > pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno));
> > + ASSERT(!pag->pagf_agflreset);
> > be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flcount, -1);
> > xfs_trans_agflist_delta(tp, -1);
> > pag->pagf_flcount--;
> > @@ -2390,6 +2482,7 @@ xfs_alloc_put_freelist(
> > agf->agf_fllast = 0;
> >
> > pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno));
> > + ASSERT(!pag->pagf_agflreset);
> > be32_add_cpu(&agf->agf_flcount, 1);
> > xfs_trans_agflist_delta(tp, 1);
> > pag->pagf_flcount++;
> > @@ -2597,6 +2690,7 @@ xfs_alloc_read_agf(
> > pag->pagb_count = 0;
> > pag->pagb_tree = RB_ROOT;
> > pag->pagf_init = 1;
> > + pag->pagf_agflreset = xfs_agfl_needs_reset(mp, agf);
> > }
> > #ifdef DEBUG
> > else if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> > index 1808f56decaa..10b90bbc5162 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> > @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_perag {
> > char pagi_inodeok; /* The agi is ok for inodes */
> > uint8_t pagf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_AGF];
> > /* # of levels in bno & cnt btree */
> > + bool pagf_agflreset; /* agfl requires reset before use */
> > uint32_t pagf_flcount; /* count of blocks in freelist */
> > xfs_extlen_t pagf_freeblks; /* total free blocks */
> > xfs_extlen_t pagf_longest; /* longest free space */
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > index 945de08af7ba..a982c0b623d0 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> > @@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xfs_extent_busy_trim,
> > __entry->tlen)
> > );
> >
> > -TRACE_EVENT(xfs_agf,
> > +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_agf_class,
> > TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_agf *agf, int flags,
> > unsigned long caller_ip),
> > TP_ARGS(mp, agf, flags, caller_ip),
> > @@ -1533,6 +1533,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xfs_agf,
> > __entry->longest,
> > (void *)__entry->caller_ip)
> > );
> > +#define DEFINE_AGF_EVENT(name) \
> > +DEFINE_EVENT(xfs_agf_class, name, \
> > + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_agf *agf, int flags, \
> > + unsigned long caller_ip), \
> > + TP_ARGS(mp, agf, flags, caller_ip))
> > +DEFINE_AGF_EVENT(xfs_agf);
> > +DEFINE_AGF_EVENT(xfs_agfl_reset);
> >
> > TRACE_EVENT(xfs_free_extent,
> > TP_PROTO(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno, xfs_agblock_t agbno,
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
