> + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
> + | (reason == BREAK_UNMAPI
> + ? XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL : 0)));
please split the assert, e.g.:
ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
switch (reason) {
+ case BREAK_UNMAPI:
ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
> + /* fall through */
> + case BREAK_WRITE:
> + error = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock, &did_unlock);
> + break;
> + default:
> + error = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return error;
I have to say I'd prefer BREAK_UNMAP over BREAK_UNMAPI given that weird
I suffix doesn't buy us anything, but that's just a minor issue.
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
