On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:15:57AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:24:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:57:52PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:32:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:16:59PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > > > just FYI the 042 xfstest does fail on xfs with what I think is stale > > > > > data exposure. It might not be related at all to what crashmonkey is > > > > > reporting but there is something wrong nevertheless. > > > > > > > > generic/042 is unreliable and certain operations result in a > > > > non-zero length file because of metadata commits/writeback that > > > > occur as a result of the fallocate operations. It got removed from > > > > the auto group because it isn't a reliable test about 3 years ago: > > > > > > Sure, I just that it clearly exposes stale data on xfs. That is, the > > > resulting file contains data that was previously written to the > > > underlying image file to catch the exposure. I am aware of the non-zero > > > length file problem, that's not what I am pointing out though. > > > > What setup are you testing on? I haven't seen it fail in some time. > > Here, on emulated pmem: > > Virtual machine with Virtio devices backed by a linear lvs consisting of > SCSI drives, all local. > > > > > SECTION -- xfs > > FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test4 4.16.0-rc5-dgc > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m rmapbt=1,reflink=1 -i sparse=1 /dev/pmem1 > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/pmem1 /mnt/scratch > > > > xfs/042 10s ... 14s > > We are talking about generic/042. xfs/042 is very much a different > test. Ugh copy-n-paste fail. Sorry. I was looking at the right test, just running the wrong one. Anyway, what makes you think this: > > SECTION -- xfs > RECREATING -- xfs on /dev/vdc1 > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 rhel7 4.16.0-rc5+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -f /dev/vdb1 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/vdb1 /mnt/test1 > > generic/042 - output mismatch (see /root/Projects/xfstests-dev/results//ext4/generic/042.out.bad) > --- tests/generic/042.out 2018-03-14 05:56:38.619124060 -0400 > +++ /root/Projects/xfstests-dev/results//ext4/generic/042.out.bad 2018-03-15 02:15:02.872113819 -0400 > @@ -5,6 +5,16 @@ > fpunch > wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) > +0000000 cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd cdcd > +* > +000f000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > +* exposes stale data? The command is: $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 1 0 64k" -c "$cmd 60k 4k" $file i.e. We wrote bytes from 0 to 64k, then punched from 60k to 64k. if the file is 64k in length, then it should contain either all "cdcd" pattern, or there should be "cdcd" data except for the range from 60k to 64k where there should be zeros. The later is exactly what the diff output is say - "cdcd" data from 0-60k, zeros from 60 to 64k. So there's no stale data exposure occurring here (those bugs got fixed!), it's just the test output is unreliable and does not match the golden output. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
