On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 08:42:58AM +0500, mikhail wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 08:52 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:27:49AM +0500, mikhail wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 09:56 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > IOWs, this is not an XFS problem. It's exactly what I'd > > > > expect to see when you try to run a very IO intensive > > > > workload on a cheap SATA drive that can't keep up with what > > > > is being asked of it.... > > > > > > > > > > I am understand that XFS is not culprit here. But I am worried > > > about of interface freezing and various kernel messages with > > > traces which leads to XFS. This is my only clue, and I do not > > > know where to dig yet. > > > > I've already told you the problem: sustained storage subsystem > > overload. You can't "tune" you way around that. i.e. You need a > > faster disk subsystem to maintian the load you are putting on > > your system - either add more disks (e.g. RAID 0/5/6) or to move > > to SSDs. > > > I know that you are bored already, but: - But it not a reason send > false positive messages in log, because next time when a real > problems will occurs I would ignore all messages. I've already explained that we can't annotate these memory allocations to turn off the false positives because that will also turning off all detection of real deadlock conditions. Lockdep has many, many limitations, and this happens to be one of them. FWIW, is there any specific reason you running lockdep on your desktop system? > - I am not believe that for mouse pointer moving needed disk > throughput. Very wildly that mouse pointer freeze I never seen > this on Windows even I then I create such workload. So it look > like on real blocking vital processes for GUI. I think I've already explained that, too. The graphics subsystem - which is responsible for updating the cursor - requires memory allocation. The machine is running low on memory, so it runs memory reclaim, which recurses back into the filesystem and blocks waiting for IO to be completed (either writing dirty data pages or flushing dirty metadata) so it can free memory. IOWs, your problems all stem from long IO latencies caused by the overloaded storage subsystem - they are propagate to all aspects of the OS via direct memory reclaim blocking on IO.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
