Re: xfs_extent_busy_flush vs. aio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 12:54:43PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 03:57 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >IOWs, inode32 limits where and how many inodes you can
> >create, not how much user data you can write inode the filesystem.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the clarifications. Looks like inode32 can be used
> to reduce some of our pain.
> 
> There's a danger that when switching from inode64 to inode32 you end
> up with the inode32 address space already exhausted, right? Does
> that result in ENOSPC or what?

ENOSPC on inode allocation.

> Anyway, can probably be fixed by stopping the load, copying files
> around, and moving them back.

Yup, assuming you're able to find the files that need to be moved in
a finite period of time.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux