On 1/29/18 9:38 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Specifying invalid inputs to mkfs does not break any (reasonable) laws,
> so the error message should complain about invalid inputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Maybe not in your state ...
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> index 7c9d148..6285b24 100644
> --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ illegal(
> const char *value,
> const char *opt)
> {
> - fprintf(stderr, _("Illegal value %s for -%s option\n"), value, opt);
> + fprintf(stderr, _("Invalid value %s for -%s option\n"), value, opt);
> usage();
> }
>
> @@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ illegal_option(
> const char *reason)
> {
> fprintf(stderr,
> - _("Illegal value %s for -%c %s option. %s\n"),
> + _("Invalid value %s for -%c %s option. %s\n"),
> value, opts->name, opts->subopts[index],
> reason ? reason : "");
> usage();
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
