On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:43:53PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Create some helper functions that we'll use later to deal with problems > we might encounter while cross referencing metadata with other metadata. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/scrub/btree.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++----- > fs/xfs/scrub/btree.h | 9 +++ > fs/xfs/scrub/common.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > fs/xfs/scrub/common.h | 28 ++++++++++ > fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c | 10 ++++ > fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h | 22 ++++++++ > 6 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) .... > -bool > -xfs_scrub_btree_process_error( > +static bool > +__xfs_scrub_btree_process_error( > struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > int level, > - int *error) > + int *error, > + bool xref, > + void *ret_ip) > { > if (*error == 0) > return true; > @@ -60,36 +62,81 @@ xfs_scrub_btree_process_error( > case -EFSBADCRC: > case -EFSCORRUPTED: > /* Note the badness but don't abort. */ > - sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > + sc->sm->sm_flags |= xfs_scrub_process_error_flag(xref); Hmmmm. WHy not just pass in the relevant error flag, rather than a boolean used to choose the error flag? > *error = 0; > /* fall through */ > default: > if (cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE) > trace_xfs_scrub_ifork_btree_op_error(sc, cur, level, > - *error, __return_address); > + *error, ret_ip); > else > trace_xfs_scrub_btree_op_error(sc, cur, level, > - *error, __return_address); > + *error, ret_ip); > break; > } > return false; > } > > +bool > +xfs_scrub_btree_process_error( > + struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > + int level, > + int *error) > +{ > + return __xfs_scrub_btree_process_error(sc, cur, level, error, false, > + __return_address); These then get easier to read, because there isn't a boolean that you don't know what it means without looking at the function being called. i.e return __xfs_scrub_btree_process_error(sc, cur, level, error, XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT, __return_address); > +} > + > +bool > +xfs_scrub_btree_xref_process_error( > + struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > + int level, > + int *error) > +{ > + return __xfs_scrub_btree_process_error(sc, cur, level, error, true, > + __return_address); return __xfs_scrub_btree_process_error(sc, cur, level, error, XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_XFAIL, __return_address); > +} > + > /* Record btree block corruption. */ > -void > -xfs_scrub_btree_set_corrupt( > +static void > +__xfs_scrub_btree_set_corrupt( > struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > - int level) > + int level, > + bool xref, > + void *ret_ip) > { > - sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > + if (xref) > + sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_XCORRUPT; > + else > + sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > > if (cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE) > trace_xfs_scrub_ifork_btree_error(sc, cur, level, > - __return_address); > + ret_ip); > else > trace_xfs_scrub_btree_error(sc, cur, level, > - __return_address); > + ret_ip); > +} > + > +void > +xfs_scrub_btree_set_corrupt( > + struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > + int level) > +{ > + __xfs_scrub_btree_set_corrupt(sc, cur, level, false, __return_address); > +} > + > +void > +xfs_scrub_btree_xref_set_corrupt( > + struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, > + int level) > +{ > + __xfs_scrub_btree_set_corrupt(sc, cur, level, true, __return_address); > } Same for these (and the other equivalent wrapper sets in the patch). > + > +/* > + * Predicate that decides if we need to evaluate the cross-reference check. > + * If there was an error accessing the cross-reference btree, just delete > + * the cursor and skip the check. > + */ > +bool > +xfs_scrub_should_xref( > + struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > + int *error, > + struct xfs_btree_cur **curpp) > +{ > + /* If not a btree cross-reference, just check the error code. */ > + if (curpp == NULL) { > + if (*error == 0) > + return true; > + goto fail; > + } > + > + ASSERT(*curpp != NULL); > + /* If no error or we've already given up on xref, just bail out. */ > + if (*error == 0 || *curpp == NULL) > + return true; Why the assert if we handle the null case just fine? > + > + /* xref error, delete cursor and bail out. */ > + xfs_btree_del_cursor(*curpp, XFS_BTREE_ERROR); > + *curpp = NULL; > +fail: I think the logic up to this point can be cleaned up to be: if (*error == 0) return true; if (curpp) { /* If we've already given up on xref, just bail out. */ if (!*curpp) return true; /* xref error, delete cursor and bail out. */ xfs_btree_del_cursor(*curpp, XFS_BTREE_ERROR); *curpp = NULL; } > + sc->sm->sm_flags |= XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_XFAIL; > + trace_xfs_scrub_xref_error(sc, *error, __return_address); > + > + /* > + * Errors encountered during cross-referencing with another > + * data structure should not cause this scrubber to abort. > + */ > + *error = 0; > + return false; > +} ..... > @@ -139,4 +155,16 @@ int xfs_scrub_get_inode(struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, struct xfs_inode *ip_in); > int xfs_scrub_setup_inode_contents(struct xfs_scrub_context *sc, > struct xfs_inode *ip, unsigned int resblks); > > +/* > + * A libxfs function returned an error while scrubbing an object. > + * If the function failed while operating on the object (!xref) then > + * mark the object itself corrupt. If the function failed while > + * collecting cross-referencing data from other metadata (xref), then > + * mark that the cross referencing failed. > + */ > +static inline __u32 xfs_scrub_process_error_flag(bool xref) > +{ > + return xref ? XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_XFAIL : XFS_SCRUB_OFLAG_CORRUPT; > +} If this is really needed, I'd like a better name - "process" doesn't read right. Maybe xfs_scrub_xref_fail_flag()? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html