On 11/28/2017 12:19 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/17] Add xfs_attr_set_defered and xfs_attr_remove_defered
"deferred"
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:21:31AM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
These routines set up set and start a new deferred attribute
operation. These functions are meant to be called by other
code needing to initiate a deferred attribute operation. We
will use these routines later in the parent pointer patches.
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h | 5 ++++
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
index 716df0f..68dc7e04 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
@@ -469,6 +469,40 @@ xfs_attr_set(
return error;
}
+/* Sets an attribute for an inode as a deferred operation */
+int
+xfs_attr_set_deferred(
+ struct xfs_inode *dp,
+ struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops,
+ void *name,
+ unsigned int namelen,
+ void *value,
+ unsigned int valuelen,
+ int flags)
+{
+
+ struct xfs_attr_item *new;
+
+ ASSERT(namelen != 0);
+ ASSERT(valuelen != 0);
We should stop the fs dead in its tracks here...
if (!namelen || !valuelen) {
ASSERT(0);
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
}
Sure. I didnt think we continued to execute after a failed assert. Is
the return statement reachable code?
+
+ new = kmem_alloc(XFS_ATTR_ITEM_SIZEOF(namelen, valuelen),
+ KM_SLEEP|KM_NOFS);
+ memset(new, 0, XFS_ATTR_ITEM_SIZEOF(namelen, valuelen));
+ new->xattri_ip = dp;
+ new->xattri_op_flags = XFS_ATTR_OP_FLAGS_SET;
+ new->xattri_name_len = namelen;
+ new->xattri_value_len = valuelen;
+ new->xattri_flags = flags;
+ memcpy(&new->xattri_name_value[0], name, namelen);
+ memcpy(&new->xattri_name_value[namelen],
+ value, valuelen);
+
+ xfs_defer_add(dfops, XFS_DEFER_OPS_TYPE_ATTR, &new->xattri_list);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Generic handler routine to remove a name from an attribute list.
* Transitions attribute list from Btree to shortform as necessary.
@@ -545,6 +579,34 @@ xfs_attr_remove(
return error;
}
+/* Removes an attribute for an inode as a deferred operation */
+int
+xfs_attr_remove_deferred(
+ struct xfs_inode *dp,
+ struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops,
+ void *name,
+ unsigned int namelen,
+ int flags)
+{
+
+ struct xfs_attr_item *new;
+
+ ASSERT(namelen != 0);
Same here.
+
+ new = kmem_alloc(XFS_ATTR_ITEM_SIZEOF(namelen, 0), KM_SLEEP|KM_NOFS);
+ memset(new, 0, XFS_ATTR_ITEM_SIZEOF(namelen, 0));
+ new->xattri_ip = dp;
+ new->xattri_op_flags = XFS_ATTR_OP_FLAGS_REMOVE;
+ new->xattri_name_len = namelen;
+ new->xattri_value_len = 0;
+ new->xattri_flags = flags;
+ memcpy(new->xattri_name_value, name, namelen);
+
+ xfs_defer_add(dfops, XFS_DEFER_OPS_TYPE_ATTR, &new->xattri_list);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*========================================================================
* External routines when attribute list is inside the inode
*========================================================================*/
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h
index 3ef3c77..8d4762a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h
@@ -175,5 +175,10 @@ int xfs_attr_list(struct xfs_inode *dp, char *buffer, int bufsize,
int xfs_attr_args_init(struct xfs_da_args *args, struct xfs_inode *dp,
const unsigned char *name, int flags);
int xfs_attr_calc_size(struct xfs_da_args *args, int *local);
+int xfs_attr_set_deferred(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops,
+ void *name, unsigned int name_len, void *value,
+ unsigned int valuelen, int flags);
+int xfs_attr_remove_deferred(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops,
+ void *name, unsigned int namelen, int flags);
All of these libxfs functions shouldn't be declared in a non-libxfs header.
--D
Ok, will move
#endif /* __XFS_ATTR_H__ */
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info athttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=Fpc-kg8nx9R7V_S5rLB6cTd7Q1hPGawg1Rion2qvk80&s=5zlzFr8rSR1c82zQ0g7vWVkvwHPG0JH4nii6W8HUe9M&e=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info athttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=Fpc-kg8nx9R7V_S5rLB6cTd7Q1hPGawg1Rion2qvk80&s=5zlzFr8rSR1c82zQ0g7vWVkvwHPG0JH4nii6W8HUe9M&e=
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html